Programmers aren’t so humble anymore, maybe because nobody codes in Perl

Programmers aren’t so humble anymore, maybe because nobody codes in Perl(wired.com)

199 points by Timothee 338 days ago | 218 comments

noisy_boy 336 days ago |

I remember reading the Perl O'Reilly book (Introduction to Perl[0]) end-to-end and basically feeling that it all makes sense - ($)calar, (@)rray and % for dictionary (because we have a pair of "o"s representing key/value) and so on. Coming from only writing bash (which is all people around me wrote), it was like a becoming a superhero overnight. I rewrote all my bash scripts in Perl and got high level language features with blazing speed. I relished taking people's bash scripts that took an hour and rewriting them in Perl for them to take barely few minutes (which was objectively terrible performance but I was a novice programmer then and nobody else knew better). I was a hotshot. It was an awesome feeling.

Later I got another role solely because they couldn't find Perl programmers and I wasn't half bad at it. But this was an actual application written by a bunch of people who wanted to write clever code and it was like handing over the keys to a missile depot to a bunch of arsonists. Many thousands LoC. By the end of it, I was told that we need to move to using Java and I could barely contain my relief.

For one-off scripts, still nothing flows like Perl. It is the most interesting language I have coded in, bar none.

[0] correction: Learning Perl, the llama book (thanks @ninkendo)

Spooky23 335 days ago | |

You stole my story! :)

I was a mediocre developer and student in my CS program and actually considered getting out at a few points. I really loved systems and building solutions though, and I ended up becoming a DBA.

For some reason my mental model resonated with Perl. I was able to use it almost like a writing process, getting my “outline” laid out in Perl and refactoring supplementing with more efficient C code or third party stuff later.

It was cool, i started fixing data integration issues and automating processes around the databases. Eventually a colleague and I basically built an application that made our DR testing failover and failback processes a two-click event. I left that company long ago and I know a bunch of our stuff ran almost 20 years before the system was migrated to AWS.

IT is more industrial and efficient these days. That’s not a bad thing, but I had alot of fun being the kid showing the old people what Linux was and gluing all of these systems to orchestrate them. Unfortunately Perl is an artifact of that era.

tsumnia 335 days ago | | |

I felt the same when I used Python to rewrite some broken/incompatible C code. It didn't save on performance, but it did reignite that hacker mindset with a clear to write language. I show students my Flask sets up and I can see the light bulbs firing off in their brains.

The older languages may be artifacts of our era of code, but I'm excited to see what the next wave of documented prompting vibe coding will bring.

I might finally understand what the heck my students' code is doing HA!

dijit 335 days ago | |

There's so much I can write here, not only do I agree with you - there remains little better for processing streams of text than perl.

Even PHPs prominence (and ease of use) can be traced back to the parts it borrows from Perl; since the web is just manipulating text after all.

I went on a similar journey to you. Started with C, moved to bash, then to perl to replace bash scripts, and you're right that it feels like a super power.

But the most interesting language I've ever coded in was probably Ruby, because it changed the way I look at languages. In Ruby, everything is an object and everything is mutable - this makes the dynamic metascripting possibilities simply absurd.

I don't advocate for these languages anymore, as Perl is easy to become "write once, read never", in a way that's much worse than bash- but I can't help but feel like we have definitely lost a killer language for text processing. Seemingly nobody writes perl anymore.

ajross 335 days ago | | |

> there remains little better for processing streams of text than perl.

That's true, but obscures what IMHO is a deeper truth: thinking in perl naturally leads to thinking in "streams of text", which is a kind of general composability that's been largely forgotten in the Unix world.

These days every project has it's own giant list of dependencies, it's own conventions about code structure, it's own list of para-toolchain utilities like linters and formatters. Often it even has it's own set of vscode extensions you pretty much have to use.

Nothing is just a tool anymore.

ieee2 335 days ago | | |

I do :)

raffael_de 335 days ago | |

The Camel Book.

There was something so wonderfully down-to-earth and humane about those O'Reilly books. But actually most IT books had something casually playful and creative about them. A quality you rarely find these days.

ninkendo 335 days ago | | |

The camel book was “programming Perl” and was more geared towards existing programmers IIRC… there was also the llama book, “learning Perl”, which was maybe what GP was referring to?

Learning Perl (the llama book) was my first programming book, and it taught me programming in general, not just Perl, and I still think it was an amazing book. Very approachable, helpful to beginners, I read it cover to cover. There’s also “learning Perl objects references and modules”, which is a bit of a sequel to Learning Perl. Those two books helped me land my first gig as a Perl programmer, and started my whole career.

noisy_boy 335 days ago | | |

It was the second book that I actually loved. I read it several times, in no particular order, like one just dives into chomping on a fond snack.

thm 335 days ago | | |

…and sadly because they're already outdated by the time they reach the printing press these days.

unixhero 335 days ago | | |

Maybe

But I couldn't understand anything of it.

Hence I became an economist within cyber security instead.

onionisafruit 335 days ago | |

Sounds very familiar. For me I was writing batch scripts and the book was Learning Perl on Win32 Systems. Otherwise it’s the same story.

animal531 335 days ago | |

Ah, back in university I wrote a paper comparing Perl, Python and Tcl/Tk.

Tcl was by far the easiest to use, while Perl sat on the other end of the spectrum for both skill needed to write it as well as to just be able to read it.

As the mantra goes, "Power, but at what cost?!?"

ajross 335 days ago | | |

Modern python is far more complicated than anything one saw in a perl 5 script back into the day. Type hints, decorators everywhere, big frameworks like numpy that force your problem into particular paradigms. The modern focus on async and iterables has had the effect of turning even simple code "inside out". It's complicated!

And what's interesting is that it's complicated in a lot of similar ways, in terms of thought space, as perl was. Perl was great because you could be clever, where you really couldn't in more pedestrian languages.

I find (and I'm not sure this is a good thing) that my python output these days feels very clever sometimes...

KaiserPro 336 days ago |

I took great pride in making readable, maintainable perl.

I worked at a VFX place that was held together by loads of perl, written over a good 15 years. Some of it was clever, but most of it was plain readable scripts.

The key to keeping it readable was decent code reviews and someone ripping the piss out of you for making unreadable soup.

Its all python nowadays, I do miss CPAN, but I don't miss perls halfarsed function args.

However for the longest time, the documentation for perl was >> than python. At the time python doc were written almost exclusively for people who knew how to python. Perl docs assumed you were in a hurry and needed an answer now, and if you were still reading by the end assumed you either cared or were lost and needed more info.

With the rise of datascience, python has lost its "oh you should be able to just guess, look how _logical_ the syntax is" to "do it like this."

CaliforniaKarl 336 days ago |

One thing I wish other languages had was Perl's taint mode: Once enabled, input coming from the outside was "tainted", along with anything you explicitly marked as tainted. If a tainted variable was used to populate another tainted variable (such as by concatenation), the result itself was tainted. If a tainted variable was used in certain ways (such as with the `open` call), the program crashed. The primary way to remove a taint was by running the variable through a regular expression, and using the captured matches (which would not be tainted).

alexpotato 336 days ago |

As both a long time Perl and long time Python user who has seen both used in production, here are some of my thoughts:

Perl

- Was an easy jump from bash to Perl

- Perl never felt like it "got in the way"

- was WAY too easy to write "write only code"

- that being said, I learned Java first and most people found MY Perl code to be very legible

- regexes as first class citizen were amazing

- backwards compatible is GREAT for older systems still running Perl (looking at you banks and some hedge funds)

Python

- Forced indentation made it MUCH easier to read other people's code

- everything is an object from day one was much better than "bless" in Perl

- no standard way of setting up an environment for MANY years hurt

- sklearn and being taught in universities were real game changers

jbullock35 336 days ago |

Leaving aside issues of language design and the emergence of other languages, it's interesting to think about other reasons why Perl lost popularity. Some of you know this history better than I do, but I think that it's now unknown to most HN readers.

The enormous reason that I see is the insistence, from Larry Wall and others, on a bottom-up "community" transition from Perl 5 to Perl 6. The design process for Perl 6 was announced at a Perl conference in 2000 [1]; 15 years later, almost every Perl user was still using Perl 5. The inability of the Perl community to push forward collectively in a timely way should be taken by every other language community as a cautionary tale.

Tim O'Reilly made a secondary point that may also be important. For a long time, Perl books were O'Reilly's biggest sellers. But the authors of those titles didn't act on his suggestion that they write a "Perl for the Web" book (really a Perl-for-CGI book). Books like that eventually came, but the refusal of leading authors to write such a book may have made it easier for PHP to get a foothold.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raku_(programming_language)#Hi...

ben7799 335 days ago |

Technically I did my first programming in the 80s as a kid. I went to college in the 1990s. I definitely learned Perl and used it.

However I would say an awful lot of the professionals I was around already thought Perl had a bad smell even in the 1990s. It was definitely looked down up on in academia by then. Maybe not in an IT department or Math department but in the CS department it was. It was used by IT guys, and QA guys, and somebody gluing some tools together. An awful lot of people thought it was unacceptable for it to be in serious production code or anything that had to be long term maintainable or be worked on by a team of people larger than size = 1. Your perception of it definitely came from where you were at the time and how you encountered it. If you were on a team producing software for sale that involved a bunch of people and you had version control and QA and everything Perl was already not your thing.

lapsed_lisper 335 days ago |

I worked in Perl for ~2.5 years in the mid-2000s. It wasn't the language for me, but I liked, respected, and am still friends with colleagues who loved it. However, I was always dumbfounded by the experience that none of them could or even professed to be sure of what most code fragments did at a glance, even fragments that only used constructs in the base language. When they worked on existing code, they'd run it, tweak it, run it again, maybe isolate some into a small file to see what it did, look at perldoc, ask questions on IRC, etc. As a Lisp guy, I'm all for interactive & iterative development, but I also like learning tools so as to use them more effectively over time. I didn't find that learning Perl made me more productive with it over time (on a modestly sized, pre-existing code base that needed both maintenance and new feature development), and the Perl lovers I knew didn't seem to mind not having this as part of their work.

Anyhow, toward the end of my time there, I had to interview candidates. Because I came to believe that the above is how one had to work with Perl, I took to asking the ones who said they knew Perl, "Can the reverse builtin reverse a list?" (I won't spoil the answer for you.) Most would answer with "Yes" or "No"; 75% of them were mistaken. Either way I'd ask them "Suppose you weren't confident about that answer. How would you determine the truth?" IIRC, 90% of them said "I'd write this one-liner..." and (I swear) 100% of the one liners would give any reasonable person an impression of an answer that turns out to be incorrect. The ones that said "I'd check the perldoc" were the only ones I'd approve for subsequent interviews.

animal531 335 days ago | |

I hate when you have code that you can't simply read to understand what it does. I'd like to say that probably 99% of the code that I write embodies that, I refuse to use complicated language constructs wherever I can, even if that makes the code longer.

When I was a kid and just started working I would still often code with whatever I came up with initially, but then you go back to that 3 months later and you have to throw the whole thing out because it's impossible to maintain or add to.

On the other hand there are sometimes additions to a language that's just so useful that you have to expand your vocabulary, for example in C# that's happened a few times. One of the notable additions there was LINQ that made manipulating data so much easier. It can become dangerous though, the same as for example with a complicated DB stored procedure.

superkuh 336 days ago |

I write some new Perl/Gtk application a couple times a year. And I use it for automating basic things almost daily. I bet lots of people chose to write in perl for personal projects. It just isn't very visible.

But not that many. And that's why Perl is still Perl. Popularity brings change which means old code stops working.

Perl code from the year 2000 still works in a perl interpreter+libs today. And perl code written today still works on perl interpreter+libs from the year 2000. That incredible stability and reliability is what makes it great. Write something then use it 20 years later and everything just works anywhere you try to run it.

That's why I chose Perl.

shawn_w 335 days ago | |

The perl I write today is very unlikely to run on a perl version from 2000, aside maybe from trivial one-liners.

welpo 336 days ago |

https://archive.is/ddaZh

gortok 335 days ago |

Perl was the first language I learned, because my local books-a-million, in the year 2000, had basically the entire O’Reilly Perl series deeply discounted ($5.99 to $9.99, a steal for a college freshman), and so I learned Perl.

The writing of the O’Reilly Perl books had this micheviousness to them that is also reflected in the language itself. It espoused an apparent simplicity in doing simple things, like reading from a file or taking user input, that languages like C++ had much more ceremony around. Likewise, when I used it to create a compliance test generator for a company I worked for, it took me a few days to write something that would take their source questions and answers and generate an entire website that folks could use to give exams and certifications for regulatory compliance.

To this day, I have not found any other language that makes text processing as easy as it was in Perl, and given how much of our work is processing text and strings, I’m still a little surprised other languages haven’t made it as easy as Perl did.

kqr 336 days ago |

A lot of people in this thread speculate that Raku (formerly "Perl 6") killed Perl. But I have yet to see convincing first hand accounts confirming that.

I certainly don't believe it. Everyone I talked to at the time who worked with Perl knew it would not go away: humanity had chained too much of the infrastructure of the internet to it. Someone would have to maintain it for many years to come, even if Larry's new experiment became a wild success. (Already back then people seemed skeptical of the experiment and hung back with Perl 5 waiting to see what came out of it before paying too much attention.)

I still struggle to understand why Perl went out of favour[1] but I think what another commenter wrote here might come close: for Unixy folks who know shell, C, awk, sed, Vim, etc. Perl is a natural extension. Then came a generation of programmers brought up on ... I don't know, Visual Basic and Java? and these were more attracted to something like Python, which then became popular enough to become the next generation's first language.

[1]: As someone who knows me might understand: https://entropicthoughts.com/why-perl

cozzyd 336 days ago |

Our experiments use some web services written in Perl (DocDB). The great thing compared to python is they they work for years untouched, through many system updates. Stuff written in Python bitrots fast (using MoinMoin for a wiki was a terrible idea, in retrospect...)

altacc 336 days ago |

> But perhaps the lesson of Perl is timeless. It asks us to be less precious—and more human—when it comes to programming languages and their design. Only then might we be able to bridge the gap between us and the machines.

I'm not clear which way the author thinks this works but having started coding in the 90s I feel that with Perl you had to try to understand the quirks of language and the language didn't try to reach out to programmers to make things easy. Whereas other coding languages aim to be intuitive, with clearer syntax, more logical naming and frameworks to obscure complexity, which to my mind is a better way to bridge the gap between us and "the machines".

kwoff 336 days ago |

It's kinda ironic, since one of the three "virtues" of a Perl programmer is hubris, heh.

(re nobody codes in Perl: I still do professionally, and I'll probably never understand why it draws so much hate)

johnisgood 336 days ago | |

I write Perl, too, and I love it. I have comments, especially next to the regexes, but honestly, I think my code is readable and maintainable because I went back to it a year later and I still understand everything.

aaronbaugher 331 days ago | |

I still use it in my job every day too. It's just become a meme, the whole "write-only language" thing. No one says that about shell scripting, despite the sigils and plenty of stuff that becomes incomprehensible to almost anyone if you do anything very complicated. I'd much rather diagnose some newbie's Perl script than some of the commercially-distributed bash installers I've had to deal with.

finaard 336 days ago |

> If I had to choose a language that is furthest from Perl, it might be Lisp.

The two languages I enjoy the most are Perl and Lisp - and the majority of my non-work related coding is split between those two.

ddellacosta 336 days ago | |

Given that Matz considers both Perl and Lisp an influence, what's your take on Ruby? If homoiconicity is something you care about it's probably dissatisfying, but it's got a lot of very functional aspects at the same time.

lambdaba 336 days ago | | |

"Ruby is the love child of Lisp and Smalltalk, raised by Perl the eccentric nanny" - Josh Susser

cestith 335 days ago | |

Indeed Perl has true lambdas and full closures and has for many many years. There’s no GIL. It supports multi-process programming, event-driven programming, and multithreading. It has optional objects. Code can be, but doesn’t have to be, written in prefix with surrounding parentheses. It can feel very natural for people coming from some form of Lisp.

Unfortunately it doesn’t do automatic tail call elimination but that’s a tooling limitation more than a language limitation.

drewcoo 336 days ago |

The three virtues of a Perl programmer are impatience, hubris, and laziness.

There's no humility in the list.

dooglius 336 days ago | |

For the downvoters: that's a quote from Larry Wall, not an insult.

fuzztester 336 days ago | | |

And there is a talk by him in which he expands upon those words too, in connection with Perl programmers.

I don't have a link, but it may have been in one of his State of the Onion talks.

https://www.google.com/search?q=larry+wall+state+of+the+onio...

throwanem 336 days ago |

I believe Perl was first called "the duct tape of the Internet" about 20 years ago.

Ever tried to deal with 20-year-old duct tape?

corytheboyd 336 days ago |

Mention of Perl will always reminds me of that time I put Perl in a PR at a Ruby shop. It was a beautiful, portable little piece of code that they made me take outside and shoot in the back of the head. Fair enough, but I will never get over it lol. I don’t even write Perl scripts for personal work anymore, I use python (only because uv makes it not awful), but it’s not about that!

inoffensivename 335 days ago |

I was a young teen when the world wide web became a thing, my Dad to gave me a copy of the camel book. I used Perl to write everything... A message board, a stats website for a MUD I was playing on, basically anything I could think of to drop in that cgi-bin directory.

All of my code was garbage of course, but it was an incredible amount of fun, a very valuable learning experience.

I miss those days, but that probably has less to do than the programming language and more to do with the carefree days. :-)

blu3h4t 336 days ago |

The first thing I think of when thinking of Perl is anything but humble, not because Perl monks aren’t humble, they certainly are, they even inspired rubys we are humble cause hi is humble I suppose :D but like I said elsewhere Perl is like nineties music its simply the best, so in my eyes Perl programmers are (unix) greybeards and the most expert you can imagine, so don’t think they could be as humble cause the level of the competency could allow quite some hubris. :D Anyway this is the analogy I see with programming languages and Linux distros, Slackware was created for lisp and its KISS principle later manifested in clojure. Early Debian was released with same Perl versions as the learning Perl book. And both have heavy emphasis on reproducibility and testing. And redhats and ibms other business is Java and redhats ceo even went to work on unity a mono fork or something. So you Perl came from Unix but it shaped Linux and by extension floss world pretty much. It’s like an elder who knows all the answers but nobody asks. Edit: ah and yes Larry was right about timtoady indeed, it can be Perl or Python or whatever :D

weare138 335 days ago |

Perl is a messy, maddening programming language

Only because people kept writing horrible code and using Perl as an excuse. Perl is like C, your code is as readable and maintainable as you choose to make it. It's like that old saying about blaming your tools. Just stop writing crap code.

ubermonkey 332 days ago | |

This.

Perl won't stop you from doing insane things, true, but you can write garbage unmaintainable code in any language.

ubermonkey 332 days ago |

The last time I wrote code every day as part of my job, it was in Perl as part of some site development using the Mason framework.

I am unapologetic about my love for Perl. Something I learned in that role was how much more important transparency is than cleverness. Perl has a way of enticing you to do very "clever" things -- there's more than one way to do it, as the saying goes, and some of those ways are VERY NEAT! Unfortunately, a large number of the "neat" approaches also approach brainfuck-levels of oddness.

Most languages don't have that rabbithole, or at least the hole isn't that deep. But with perl, man, you can do some ridiculous and awesome things that even YOU won't immediately understand six months from now.

About the 2nd or 3rd time you get bit by that particular snake, though, you start to build your code much more conservatively, and with much more of a long-term intentionality built in. The code I wrote in that job after those lessons took root is still probably the best work I've done as a programmer -- neat, clean, consistent, and above-all understandable to whomever ended up needing to work on it later. And I put a lot of that down to just how easy it is to write HORRIBLE Perl.

elashri 336 days ago |

I am not old enough to have learned perl but not young enough to not know some perl and its problems.

But the article or at least the title would be much more suitable if perl is replaced by "CUDA". You can't be working with that and be arrogant, because even self centric people would suffer enough pain not to change. And if perl makes you feel it is made by humans. Then "CUDA" sure would feel like something that came straight from the hell.

Note: I understand that the article is more about talking about perl and remind people that it existed and was famous language one day. But I couldn't resist the temptation of the title.

shermantanktop 336 days ago | |

Interesting - one of the most single-mindedly arrogant engineers I ever worked with was an absolute zealot about CUDA.

Could not stop talking about CUDA, and why everything else was terrible, and how nobody listened to him, and how that was because they couldn't handle the truth, and how he could solve everyone's problems if they would only let him, on and on. He didn't last that long at my company.

Maybe he was taking his CUDA pain and pushing it onto other people.

paxys 336 days ago |

No it's because we are getting paid too much.

slt2021 336 days ago | |

this one, once money trickled in, tech attracted people who are doing it for the money only, not for the love of tech.

big tech sort of replaced wall street as main career choice for some people and naturally attracted "wallstreet bros" type into the tech, who are now known as "tech bros"

npteljes 336 days ago | | |

Or, one could argue that the influx of money and the ever-increasing hardware capability enabled saner, more human languages. Human both in design, as in, easier to learn, more accommodating to human mental models, and human in a way that they account more for human fallacies. Something that old languages, and lower levels of abstractions cannot do, because it's expensive to double-check, or to defend against the human.

ProofHouse 335 days ago |

Vibe coders who I love that it exists and they exist, are what annoy me most. They don’t know what they don’t know and now they think they’re Snr devs when most don’t even know what SQL means. They others saying ‘I’m a programmer’ chest out, like have some humility jeez. Plunging a toilet doesn’t make me a plumber

cafard 335 days ago |

At some point around 2015, I looked around and noticed that the young (< 35) all seemed to know Python, and that only the middle-aged and older (> 45) seemed to know Perl. I decided that future work, where I had an option, would be in Python. There were a couple where I hesitated, but they are gone.

At the beginning of the transition, I had to look up Python idioms for what I knew in my fingers in Perl. Over the last couple of years, when it made sense for a one-off in Perl, I would omit semicolons, omit braces, count on significant indentation. Can I still write Perl? Yes, and not badly, but not as fluently as before about 2018.

ddellacosta 336 days ago |

I can't read this article due to the paywall, but here's my lukewarm take based on the title at least: "nobody" codes in Perl any more because the language lost a lot of mindshare in the transition from Perl 5 to Perl 6, a.k.a. Raku. And regardless it's always been a fairly idiosyncratic language in a lot of ways. Stuff like Ruby (which inherits DNA from Perl along with Lisp and Smalltalk), PHP (also takes some notes from Perl, perhaps more superficially), and Python ate a lot of its lunch.

It was the first language I wrote professionally and I always thought it was a lot of fun, but if I want to be humbled these days I reach for Haskell (like a lot of the Perl community it sounds like...).

EDIT: okay I read the article, thanks to welpo for the archive link. Yeah this is kind of a nostalgic piece so I think my original comment is still relevant. I do like Perl still, I will always have a spot in my heart for it. I appreciate especially how seriously Larry Wall tried to think about approaching things vis-a-vis linguistics even if I don't necessarily think that's the best approach for a language used by an engineering team these days.

I hope it sticks around in any case. It is truly unique.

stouset 336 days ago | |

I agree it was a combination of Raku and Ruby. As far as I'm concerned, Ruby deprecates Perl 5. It fills the same niche while avoiding a lot of the absolutely crazier parts of Perl (no shade; Perl was designed in a far different time and place). If you know Ruby, there is essentially zero reason to learn Perl. I have fond memories of the language, it was the first one I wrote professionally, but never again.

Raku being in such an indeterminate state for so long was an eternity for it to lose mindshare to Ruby.

ddellacosta 336 days ago | | |

> If you know Ruby, there is essentially zero reason to learn Perl.

I don't think I ever thought about it but I think I have implicitly taken this to heart since I last was using Perl seriously. Almost every engineering org I've worked for in the last decade has had Ruby as a part of its stack for e.g. scripting or lambdas and it's what I reach for when I need to script something. And I've done Rails work in a few orgs too, which has few parallels in its niche even without considering Perl.

Although I suspect for most people Python is where they land if we're just talking about scripting or hacking something together...or anything (I hate it but it is what it is lol).

citrin_ru 336 days ago | | |

> If you know Ruby, there is essentially zero reason to learn Perl

When I still used Perl (10y ago) Ruby was notably slower on many tasks. Ruby probably the slowest among popular script languages.

calmbonsai 336 days ago | |

I used Perl extensively for small-network (~25 boxen) sysadmin and local/personal tooling, but never in cluster/multi-node deployed production. It gave too much freedom for expression making it difficult to "team-scale".

I stopped using it circa 2000 for no real reason other than Python was easier for teams to adopt and common modules became well-maintained enough where CPAN was no longer a competitive advantage. It also helped that Guido lived and worked a few minutes north in Reston, VA back then.

That said, I still "think" in Perl regex to this very day. ;)

ddellacosta 336 days ago | | |

> That said, I still "think" in Perl regex to this very day. ;)

Yeah good point, if there's one thing from Perl that will live far longer than the language itself it's PCREs. I can't thank my experience with the language enough for my facility in crafting regexps.

xarope 336 days ago | | |

Agreed, Perl introduced me to REGEX and hashes. To this day, whenever I do any work with data, I tend to think in terms of REGEX first rather than convoluted string manipulation.

graemep 336 days ago | |

Like many paywalls it goes away if you turn off JS.

agentultra 335 days ago |

I enjoyed how witty and charming the community was back in the 90s when I was into Perl.

I had a similar path to Perl as a lot of people here. I was making games and into C when I learned about Linux from a friend. From there I heard about Perl and started using it to automate making my websites… those halcyon days before someone started calling them “web logs,” and later, “blogs,” etc.

Text munching and slinging around files was much easier in Perl than it was in C and I became a big fan.

The community was awesome. And the books were great.

I feel like Perl embodied that hipster-Socialist Bazaar style moment in programming/tech.

Western0 335 days ago |

I use perl , still is fast and very intuit for writing small code (but not for reading it after a week)

niccl 336 days ago |

Hmm. and PERL is not one of the most popular languages these days. In contrast with Python and its

  There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.

It does not seem coincidence to me

aynyc 336 days ago | |

There is almost nothing in today’s Python world that follow that axiom.

There is a new package manager every year. Language features are introduced every major release.

fch42 336 days ago | | |

But there are 500 linters to help you with idio(to)matic python coding. Honi soit qui mal y pense ...

SoftTalker 336 days ago | |

Yeah I think TIMTOWTDI ended up being a net negative. Of course with experience and learning the idioms (perl is very idiomatic) it's not so bad but it really adds to the cognitive load for a beginner.

There is still a lot of perl around but I'd be a little surprised if any new projects would use it at least where it doesn't already have a big presence.

rossant 336 days ago | | |

In case anyone asks: there is more than one way to do it.

Natsu 336 days ago | |

There are still a few of us Perl programmers around, though it's far less popular than it was a few decades ago.

mrweasel 335 days ago | |

Well, I mean there's frequently the obvious way to do something, then there's a large number of less obvious ways, then there's the obvious way of doing it if you're mostly programming using Pandas, or NumPy, and Python is more of an implementation detail.

I agree with the intention of the quote, sadly it didn't work out like that.

drewcoo 336 days ago | |

Perl is not an acronym.

_kst_ 336 days ago | | |

Not officially, but there are a couple of retronyms.

Larry Wall originally wanted to call it "Pearl", but found there was already a language by that name, so he shortened it to "Perl".

The name is sometimes expanded as "Practical Extraction and Report Language", or as "Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister" (Larry Wall's own phrase, mentioned in the Perl man page).

But yes, "Perl", not "PERL", is the correct name for the language.

(Ada, which was named after a person, has had the same problem, though as far as I know there isn't even a retronym for Ada.)

boothby 335 days ago |

Kids these days aren't learning Malbolge as their first language and it really shows.

I loved Basic, then VisualBasic, then C, and then Perl... and after Perl, I've never really found it challenging to learn a new language. After almost a year of working on some cgi script (gossamer threads, I think?) I had this alarming realization that I did not understand the context of a block of code I seemed to spend most of my time editing. It was a multi-page regular expression. I was (and am still) pretty naive to how the language is implemented or even parsed, and I find it most interesting how we can write in languages with the barest understanding of their underlying details. I'm at that point with a lisp, occasionally catching glimpses below the surface, but now with decades of diving deep and in other languages. Sometimes I think it might be fun to return to Perl, but when I read modern Perl, it seems to bear such little resemblance to the code of 25 years ago.

kkylin 336 days ago |

https://xkcd.com/224/

karel-3d 336 days ago |

Perl sigils are horrible; perl magical variables are horrible, perl lack of sane object and argument passing is horrible. (Moose was improvement but slow, if I remember well.) It's a language of cludges on top of other cludges.

I guess it became popular because it existed and there was nothing better (nobody will write in awk if not pressed to).

We don't need badly designed tools to stay humble. There is enough cognitive load from all the bad programmers (and now LLMs spewing slop), no need to add another nonsense.

I admit though that writing perl makes you feel "clever" - "huh that's a funny shortcut I didn't know! Writing $\<>^^ will give me name of last used file on blue moon on thursday!" but... uh.

WesolyKubeczek 335 days ago | |

> I admit though that writing perl makes you feel "clever" - "huh that's a funny shortcut I didn't know! Writing $\<>^^ will give me name of last used file on blue moon on thursday!" but... uh.

I write Perl and I hate this mindset a lot. A LOT. Some people get excited and feel like they are megawizards of the White Council because they can line up all their sigils and make them dance, and thus feel just that little bit superior. There's nothing superior about maintaining a program where to change it, you need to solve puzzles three, make the change, and wrap it in another puzzle for the next guy.

I know that feeling of being a wizard, and I used to have that smug expression on my face, too. But now I'm over 40, and I'm jumping from one place to another in a magical codebase to debug it, and I can't help but feel like if it was just that little bit less magical, I could have fixed it and be done with it quite a while ago already.

antithesizer 335 days ago |

Discovering Perl made me feel like a god.

Dove 335 days ago |

I miss perl. I encountered it in school, in 1998, and fell head over heels in love. Used it professionally a lot longer than was probably justified, given the mores and availability of programmers. The Camel Book set my formative opinions on what software should be like, and I'll surely be a perl programmer at heart forever.

I gave it up in 2020, perceiving that python had won. It was a sad day - working in python feels like typing while missing three fingers. I go to reach for an idiom and not only is it not there, I'm told the phantom limb syndrome is for everyone's good, including mine.

I've never found the code of skilled perl programmers difficult to read. I think bad programmers will always write code that is difficult to work with, even in languages that are supposed to prevent it. The most miserable time I ever had understanding someone else's code came at the hands of a brilliant, overly clever, somewhat inexperienced python hacker. I will admit, though, that this feat of confusion required a prodigy, whereas perl makes it quite easy to shoot everyone in a thirty yard radius in the foot. Just the same, I've always thought the messiness of perl was a myth, a result of misuse, abuse, and inexperience. Well written perl conveys much at a glance where in visually cleaner languages, all shapes have the same outline.

But it's also true that by the time I gave it up, I was already looking for a replacement. The language is bold and beautiful and opinionated, and in the fullness of time, some of those opinions proved to be wrong. The world moved forward and perl didn't, and I found myself wanting to do things with objects, and types, and tooling, and functions, and exceptions, that it just didn't do, or didn't do well. Some languages, like PHP and javascript, grew beyond their humble beginnings and bolted on the rigorous and increasingly mandatory machinery of the modern world. Perl didn't.

So my leaving had two big factors: the language didn't grow up, and people didn't want to read my code.

I'm still looking for a replacement. The serious contenders seem to be Go and Ruby, both of which I really like a lot. I dabble in Haskell and Lisp looking for pieces of what I've lost. I have negotiated an uneasy ceasefire with python and javascript out of professional obligation. We can work together, though admittedly neither one of us is entirely happy about it.

Perl was a beautiful thing, a thing I appreciated like art and poetry. I'm glad to have been there for the years in which it flourished. But I also think the world has passed it by. Even looking past hacked in features, it had a more fundamental problem. The tug of war between standardization and expression is like the one between society and the individual. Neither side should ever really win, but perl favored expression more than we now think is wise. We didn't know it then. And the feeling was glorious. But in the decades since, we all - myself included - have decided the balance between those things is ... well we don't know exactly where it is, but we do know it involves less individual freedom than that. The language made a lot of gambles that turned out wrong, but that's the big one.

I think lisp fell prey to that, too, by the way. So formless and expressive that by the time you got done writing your software, you'd essentially invented a language specific to it. Great, in the narrow scope of your project, language and domain fitting hand in glove. Not awesome if you need to hire help. Ads for people who speak Emacs Lisp or Autocad Lisp are telling. You can invent the most beautiful language in the world, but the fact that only three people speak it is surely a strong point against it.

Perl is and was a beautiful thing. I miss it. I seek out its children when I can. I write jokes and references and eulogies where I can, tucking little utility functions stolen from perl into languages where they don't belong, places that never touched that unix heritage. Perl is humble enough to give you the space to do things your way, rather than its way, giving you permission to break all the rules and requesting that you use the freedom with wisdon and goodness and politeness. That sort of bold faith and generosity sparks in me a fierce love. I haven't found it anywhere else. I doubt I will, because as wonderful as it is, it's since been considered unwise. Programming is a social endeavor, and while a specialist language like GLSL can thrive in a little niche, a glue language spoken by only a few people isn't a glue language at all - it's another arcane system that needs to be glued. No, python won. Perhaps it even deserved to.

So for me, perl is dead... but also long live perl.

18172828286177 336 days ago |

> If I had to choose a language that is furthest from Perl, it might be Lisp.

Rust

layer8 335 days ago | |

They are similarly punctuation-heavy, and both use C-derived syntax, and both are imperative languages, so I would disagree.

forinti 335 days ago | |

But Perl has list-in-list-out functions, just like Lisp. Sure, they don't look alike, but they have this important characteristic in common.

I'd say Perl is the fruit of the marriage between shell and Lisp.

johnisgood 336 days ago | |

He said furthest. That might be Lisp or Haskell or anything along these lines.

test1072 336 days ago |

Paywall

devonnull 336 days ago | |

Not no more: https://archive.is/ddaZh

def fizzbuzz(n, *args): cur = ['' for x in range(1,n+1)] for m, postfix in args: cur = [y+postfix if x%m==0 else y for x, y in zip(range(1,n+1), cur)] cur = [str(x) if y == '' else y for x, y in zip(range(1,n+1), cur)] return cur print("\n".join(fizzbuzz(100, (3, 'fizz'), (5, 'buzz'))))