Ask HN: What toolchains are people using for desktop app development in 2025?

113 points by lincoln20xx 281 days ago | 132 comments

I recently came across a comment [0] here that highlighted the challenges of building native desktop apps with LLMs. The commenter pointed out how scarce training resources have become—few blog posts, tutorials, or open-source projects exist compared to web or mobile development. They also noted that while desktop app development was a solid career path in the 90s, it's now seen as a dead end for most, outside of big players like Microsoft or Adobe.

This got me thinking: My own experience with desktop development dates back to the late 90s using Turbo Pascal 6 in Delphi, and I'm out of the loop on modern practices. With the evolving landscape, I'm curious about what tools and workflows developers are actually using today.

Some questions to spark discussion:

- What programming languages and frameworks are popular for desktop apps? - Are there any go-to IDEs, build tools, or libraries that make development easier? - Do the above answers change if you care about code performance or efficiency (whatever that means to you)? - Is native desktop app development still viable as a career, or are most greenfield projects shifting to web-based alternatives?

I'd love to hear from folks with recent experience—success stories, pitfalls, and recommendations would be great. Thanks in advance for sharing!

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44841291

mg 281 days ago |

Now that Chromium supports the File System Access API on desktop and mobile, I am building every software I need as HTML+JS+CSS.

Before that, handling files in the browser was cumbersome. You had to offer download and upload links for users to manage files. And handling whole directories was impossible.

But now web apps are like native software tools that you can use to edit and manage files on the file system.

And the bonus point is that what you build this way is fully functional on mobile too. Right away, without any changes. At least on Android.

Mars008 281 days ago | |

What about FireFox, does/will it support file system access? I'm not an expert, just thinking this way and don't like Chromium. The idea is to use light web server in application + browser with JS. This makes it easier and more convenient as it can naturally run remote, on microprocessor. Also LLMs are good at generating such UIs.

rpdillon 281 days ago | | |

This is how I develop all the software that I don't work on professionally. I have a variety of small web servers with various capabilities that I use. The latest is Copy Party, which I learned about from HN a couple of weeks ago. My apps are then single files that know how to write modified copies of themselves back to the server. The server is dumb, it doesn't really know that it's anything other than just a file upload. I then use SyncThing to replicate that folder structure across all my devices so I have offline access by default.

8organicbits 281 days ago | | |

https://caniuse.com/native-filesystem-api

Looks like Firefox does not support it currently.

lyu07282 281 days ago | |

+1 Another bonus is that it's properly sandboxed, you only give access to the files/directories and other resources it needs.

robertoandred 281 days ago | |

Except you lose native document UI features. Especially frustrating in Electron "apps".

jlarocco 281 days ago |

At work we use C#, .Net, and WPF. I've only used it at this company, and I can't say for sure if my dislikes are with WPF, or how our codebase is using it. Overall it's not terrible, except for being proprietary and Windows only.

Outside of work, I'm out in left field using Common Lisp for most of my projects, so I'm not sure how helfpul this is, but...

In the past, I used Qt4 because there was an amazing Common Lisp binding and it worked well on Linux, FreeBSD and OSX. It's increasingly hard to use Qt4 any more, though, and changes in the Qt project made the technique used by the Qt4 bindings impractical for Qt5 or Qt6 - at least that was my understanding when I looked into it.

For newer things I've tried LTK but don't really like the looks of it and I wouldn't say it's "modern". It seems to work across platform well enough, though, and for simple stuff it's okay.

More often than not I'm using a combination of the Slime tools in Emacs in combination with an GLFW/OpenGL window. Often I'll use the inspector to display data and make changes that show up in an OpenGL window, or run some commands in the REPL and pop up an image in an external viewer or load something in a browser. It only works for certain types of applications, and I won't even pretend it's practical for end users, but it works pretty well, and it's flexible as a developer.

I'm curious to see what other people say. It's been a while since I madea full blown GUI application.

MarkSweep 281 days ago | |

There are defiantly better and worse ways to use WPF. Personally I dislike it when data binding is done in XAML, because there is no compile time error if you rename a property on the C# side.

When I wrote a WPF app at my last job, I write a micro MVVM framework. Basically just an implement ion of INotifyPropertyChanged on the model side and some extension methods to bind the properties to UI elements. It was as strongly typed as possible in WPF.

stassats 280 days ago | |

> changes in the Qt project made the technique used by the Qt4 bindings impractical for Qt5 or Qt6 - at least that was my understanding when I looked into it.

It was hard to do reasonably with qt4 already. The best solution would be to support the C++ ABI natively, but that's never going to happen.

vladdoster 281 days ago |

Flutter is a super compelling framework (https://flutter.dev/multi-platform/desktop), but I’d live in fear of it randomly being sent to the Google graveyard.

x0x0 281 days ago | |

It had layoffs in 2024. And Google has emitted a bunch of words about their support for Flutter, but hasn't taken the most obvious step towards solidifying support: guarantee a minimal spend level on Flutter dev for a decade, either internally or by donating to an external foundation. eg we will spend $x on Flutter until 2036. :shrug: So they've carefully retained the option to cut support at will. Which is their choice, but I recently wasn't comfortable starting a greenfield project in it for that reason.

muzani 277 days ago | | |

Everyone says this but personally it's been fine for me in 2025. It won't land you a job or funding because people are afraid of it. But if you're going to just build tools, it works.

doawoo 281 days ago | |

We shipped a project at work with Flutter recently, specifically using it on embedded Linux, basically a touch screen smart apartment tablet/thermostat combo.

Internally the “UI” team is tiny (basically me, a UI/Designer and one or two other part time engineers) and the productivity is astounding tbh

written-beyond 281 days ago | | |

Which embedder did you guys end up using, Toyota or flutter-elinux

gaws 280 days ago | |

> I’d live in fear of it randomly being sent to the Google graveyard.

Knowing Google, this happening is almost a guarantee. You should consider moving to another framework with a longer shelf life.

mnk47 275 days ago | | |

Go is still going strong after 15 years. Dart, the language of Flutter, is 13 years old.

zaphirplane 281 days ago | |

I do have to wonder if decoupling dart from flutter would boost flutter. Flutter and typescript, dart is fine but you know most people have another major language with tooling and what not

doawoo 280 days ago | | |

I am primarily an Elixir engineer so Dart was the exact opposite of what I’m usually working in, that said it’s not hard to get up to speed on Dart conventions- and other team members were able to get up and contributing in a couple weeks

mikewarot 281 days ago |

Lazarus is the open source equivalent to Delphi these days, and for the most part it's awesome. (The documentation, on the other hand... just isn't fit for purpose)

I've been using Visual Studio Code and Github Copilot together, and it seems to work ok. I've not used it heavily, though, as I'm retired.

rcarmo 278 days ago | |

Lazarus currently works very poorly on the Mac, alas. Everything from installing to actually building a simple form was broken in various ways.

phba 278 days ago | |

Yes, Lazarus + FreePascal is great and imo preferable to Embarcadero Delphi nowadays.

_mlbt 281 days ago | |

I've found that you can mostly just use old Delphi books as a starting point for learning Lazarus.

cosmic_cheese 281 days ago |

Still plain old Swift (or when the itch strikes, Objective-C) and AppKit. I don’t really build for platforms other than macOS because I haven’t found toolkits that feel right elsewhere. I would do just about anything for multiplatform AppKit.

1over137 281 days ago | |

AppKit is indeed great. Pity Apple doesn’t give it much love anymore.

dabockster 274 days ago | |

I've built stuff in Qt before and it's great, but it's super expensive if you want to use it for proprietary work.

ivm 280 days ago | |

One option would be using C# + AppKit on Mac and then WinUI on Windows, while sharing the view model and model layers between platforms with something like MvvmCross.

Here's my attempt from 2021: https://github.com/QotoQot/Octospace

foresto 281 days ago |

Topping my list of GUI toolkit requirements are cross-platform and native look & feel. As far as I know, Qt still beats everything else in these areas on the desktop. It's mostly excellent.

However, I find The Qt Group's commercial licensing (and their tactics as reported by various people on HN) a little scary. If I were to go commercial, I think I would stick with LGPL Qt and link dynamically or give customers my object files for re-linking, because I get the impression that accepting a commercial Qt license could restrict my ability to use open-source Qt elsewhere. I suppose there might be some other way to safely navigate those waters, but from what I've read, The Qt Group has a reputation for making this far from hassle-free. It's not an immediate problem because I currently use Qt only for open-source and personal tools.

I have grown tired of C++, so I've been using Python to drive Qt. The bindings are very good, mirroring the C++ API so closely that I just use the C++ docs when I need to look something up.

I've also been watching for Qt bindings to other compiled languages, mainly for distributing non-Linux GUI apps more simply than Python allows. Such bindings often turn out to expose only Qt Quick, which lacks functionality that I sometimes need, but there are a few that expose Qt Widgets. For example, these Go bindings:

https://github.com/mappu/miqt

I hope we'll eventually see a cross-platform GUI toolkit rivaling Qt in a language more pleasant than C++ (and ideally easier to bind to other languages). The one being developed for internal use by the Zed editor has some promising ideas about how to render native-looking text, which I think is a good start:

https://zed.dev/blog/videogame

https://www.gpui.rs/

pastorhudson 281 days ago | |

I’m hopeful that toga will be good for python dev cross platform including iOS and android. I haven’t tried it yet though. https://beeware.org/project/toga/

jenadine 281 days ago | |

Gpui is not on crates.io. This is a problem with Rust UI in general that they are not stable and often change API. The only exception here is Slint which seems stable in 1.x for some years.

rixed 281 days ago | |

I've been reading these threads litteraly for decades, hopping that someone would finally bring to light a better deal than Qt.

Will come back next year :-(

akkartik 281 days ago |

As someone who loved Turbo Pascal, for the past 3 years I use Lua and LÖVE.

https://akkartik.name/freewheeling

dazzawazza 281 days ago |

Within game development it's Dear ImGui. https://github.com/ocornut/imgui

Normally with the Windows DX12 backend, sometimes with the SDL+OpenGL backend if you want cross platform support.

Other frameworks are sort of disappearing. C++ all the way although some use it with C#.

Palomides 281 days ago |

Qt with QML for a somewhat embedded use case. I think it hits a really nice intersection of native speed, GPU acceleration, interfacing with C++, and ease of development.

I wouldn't really recommend a career out of it.

LarMachinarum 281 days ago | |

Qt used to be what I used as well, but the licensing has become so repulsive for professional use that I now refuse to touch it now (not even for my open source side projects where this wouldn't be an issue).

Too bad the hopes from the early Nokia adoption days got smashed by MS mole Elop and the later owners of Qt.

nextos 281 days ago | | |

Yeah, it's quite sad to see Qt on the N9 and, now, on SailfishOS.

We were robbed of a future with lightweight and responsive native apps. Android pales in comparison.

hermitcrab 281 days ago | | |

I have a small business license which I use for developing 3 commercial application. It is ~$1000 per year and the licensing seems quite reasonable.

ahartmetz 280 days ago | | |

The licensing barely changed, the only change is the scare tactics of the Qt Company. The only thing to do is not to get scared by such legally meaningless noise.

ranger_danger 281 days ago | | |

We have no issues shipping both FOSS (LGPL) and proprietary solutions using Qt without having to pay any license fee... not sure what issues you're running into.

diego_moita 281 days ago | |

> I wouldn't really recommend a career out of it.

Care to say why? I ask because that's what I use at work: C++ and Qt

Yes, I'd prefer Rust and Slint/Tauri.

But like a prostitute I don't do what I love, I do what pays the bills.

cocoa19 281 days ago | | |

> Yes, I'd prefer Rust and Slint/Tauri.

Ah, you like masochism I see. I bet you use it for your personal projects, but not at all for commercial projects. It’s just not there yet.

Palomides 281 days ago | | |

I think it's a little too niche, and as embedded processors get more and more powerful, we'll just see the same trend of doing all UI in a browser instead

I do like working in it, though!

Philpax 281 days ago |

Rust + egui, but it's a far cry from the convenience or iteration speed of the web. Wherever possible, I build webapps instead, just because it's so much faster to get results (especially with LLMs!)

With that being said, I'd like to try the modern .NET stack sometime. Shame that the UI side of things is still largely Windows-only, and even Microsoft themselves don't know which UI framework they're using this week.

exceptione 281 days ago | |

See Avalonia, cross-platform .net core.

ThinkBeat 281 days ago |

Delphi is the easiest and most integrated way of writing cross platform UIs and it has been for a lot of years. It might not be sexy, but highly productive.

You can download and use a community edition of Delphi for free. The downside is insane licensing costs if you are making commercial software.

I an not sure how far Lazarus has come but I believe it to have the same or similar abilities and if free and libre.

phba 278 days ago | |

I use Delphi at work quite a lot. The language is great, but the Embarcadero Studio is unfit for any non-trivial project and getting worse with every new version.

Nowadays I definitely prefer Lazarus.

cryptoalex 281 days ago |

Delphi was so ahead of its time (a mandatory remark)... I've used Delphi 1 to 4 then moved on to other things. Using .NET since 1.0 beta, and it still remains my favorite stack. The project I am currently building is a software infra for building E2EE applications, and it requires a little bit of everything - mobile apps for key management, desktop/cli apps/client libraries for actually encrypting data, sometimes a web based app, and a zero trust backend. Using Xamarin/MAUI for mobile apps, Blazor WASM for Web, Blazor Hybrid / MAUI / Avalonia UI for Desktop. All of the frameworks have their quirks, so it may take a bit of time to learn your patterns, build your base classes, but after that you pretty much enjoy the productivity of a modern high level language.

- What programming languages and frameworks are popular for desktop apps? - for me - Blazor Hybrid / MAUI / Avalonia UI / WinForms

- Are there any go-to IDEs, build tools, or libraries that make development easier? - I use MSVS 2022, VSCode for .NET, IntelliJ for $$$ at work. There are of course UI control libraries, I am using MudBlazor for Blazor WASM / Hybrid, other than that I use built-in controls that come with each framework. I try to use as little as possible of 3rd party libraries b/c my apps are security-sensitive.

- Do the above answers change if you care about code performance or efficiency (whatever that means to you)? - in my case no, I am able to find what I need in .NET ecosystem. Modern .NET supports ahead-of-time compilation compiling to native code, and that helps to reduce start-up time which is important for Desktop / CLI. Ironically, for a long running processes, like a web service, the just-in-time compilation sometimes produces code running faster than ahead-of-time compilation, b/c it learns most common execution paths at runtime, and is able to recompile on the fly, optimizing for most frequent execution paths, giving a non-trivial performance boost in some cases

- Is native desktop app development still viable as a career, or are most greenfield projects shifting to web-based alternatives - depends on the app/use case. For my project, desktop is the first class citizen, but I am building E2EE apps, i.e. end-to-end-encryption apps, aka client-side encryption, and native / Desktop / CLI is a better fit for E2EE in most of the cases compared to web apps. For those Web apps that I have it is still E2EE but in the browser (still client side encryption)

bsoles 281 days ago |

To my dismay, my company uses JavaScript, HTML, CSS with a custom Chromium-based web browser installed on your PC. The performance is shit: GUI performance that should take milliseconds takes seconds to render with constant pinging of corporate servers and user activity logging. Development mostly done in IntelliJ or VS Code.

leptons 281 days ago | |

Those problems aren't JS/HTML/CSS problems, they are bad programmer problems. If the performance of your webapp sucks, then you did something wrong somewhere, but it wasn't choosing JS/HTML/CSS that caused the problem. There are plenty of very performant web applications.

yjftsjthsd-h 281 days ago | |

At that point, what's the point in maintaining your own browser fork instead of just telling users to point their own (Blink, even) browser at localhost?

bsoles 281 days ago | | |

Control of the chrome around the browser page I guess.

AaronAPU 281 days ago |

I’m using JUCE C++ which is very popular for audio software. But it can be used for more general purpose applications. The latest version has some kind of HTML based UI system but I’ve not migrated yet.

joefourier 281 days ago | |

I’ve tried it in the latest plug-in I’ve worked on - it’s just a webview embedded in the window. It’s really great for faster development of more complex plug-ins but there’s some downsides when it comes to performance and integration with the DAW (I had to do some nasty hacks to get handle mouse clicks and keypresses properly).

I think it would be possible to have those advantages in JUCE/C++ without a webview tho. Maybe just moving to a declarative UI approach for positioning and styles with the ability to refresh (something like litehtml could be handy for that)?

debrisapron 281 days ago | |

I’m using this too. You get all the JUCE stuff with a web frontend, and it uses the system web view so no huge Chromium binary. The downside is there’s no OS bindings out of the box, you have to provide everything via your native bridge.

dochtman 281 days ago |

Tauri seems interesting. It combines a Rust core with the platform-native browser engine for presentation. Of course a potential downside is rendering incompatibilities between engines/platforms.

jerlendds 278 days ago | |

IME Tauri performance sucks on Linux so thats something worth keeping in mind if you go that route (https://github.com/tauri-apps/tauri/issues/3988)

kcartlidge 281 days ago |

- Some mentions of Lazarus and FreePascal (so basically a cross-platform open source Delphi equivalent). And I'd agree with them.

- For C# I like AOT assemblies using Uno or Avalonia.

- For Go I like TCell (which does cross-platform console mode text GUIs [with cursor positioning, colours, mouse, etc]).

- If you're doing vibe coding I find it tends to work best with Electron.

- The big omission here is anything Python; I don't do desktop apps in Python so can offer nothing. Same for Ruby, though Hotwire Native looks interesting.

fuzztester 278 days ago | |

>The big omission here is anything Python

wxPython and PyQt are some options. PySide too. There are some other less-known ones too. I've not tried Kivy. There is also tkinter which comes built-in with Python.

IIRC, the Dropbox GUI client app was done with wxPython on both Linux and Windows.

woile 281 days ago |

Slint-ui with rust (they have bindings for cpp, Python and js).

Quite good, I've been building this Pomodoro:

https://github.com/reciperium/temporis/

I've also used nix to build the packages when possible.

One of the things I like about slint is that it has native components. They also have experimental support for Android and iOS.

The language is quite simple as well. Though it could benefit from something like flex

pragmatic 281 days ago |

Windows Forms are alive and well.

Still supported in latest .net versions.

dmitrybrant 281 days ago | |

A hearty +1 to using WinForms (as long as your desktop app targets Windows only, of course). The fact that WinForms has outlasted so many other UI toolkits is a testament to its simplicity and ease of use. I still use it in numerous personal projects, and I don't foresee Microsoft dropping support for it anytime in the near future.

leptons 281 days ago | |

I'm still using a few JScript.NET Windows forms applications I wrote over 10 years ago. Works great. jsc.exe is still on every Windows machine, and makes it easy to write Javascript and compile to .exe or even .dlls.

juped 281 days ago | |

Avalonia is my go-to on .net. It's not too far from WPF.

electroly 281 days ago | |

Same. Claude is good at it. Plenty of training material and the way we design Windows Forms apps hasn't changed in 20+ years.

anonymousd3vil 281 days ago |

I'm personally aware and used few Desktop app building frameworks like Flutter, Tauri, Electron. I think you might have some luck with Electron support for LLMs since its early development and resources available. But I personally like to use Tauri recently, its backend is Rust but you can plug it in with any JS, CSS framework and develop your application.

PhilippGille 281 days ago |

For Go, I've been using Wails [1] and Fyne [2]. The former uses a web view for the UI, the latter is Go only.

[1] https://github.com/wailsapp/wails

[2] https://github.com/fyne-io/fyne

sltr 281 days ago |

On my projects [1][2], I use C# and Avalonia with Rider or Visual Studio. For extra performance, turn on AOT, which has the nice side-effect of making reversing your app to C# impossible.

I worked in WPF for a decade. I wouldn't go with it for a new project since it's Windows-only and doesn't support AOT.

At work we have a Blazor MAUI hybrid desktop app because it also has to run on the web. If we only needed a desktop app, I'd go with Avalonia.

[1] https://linklever.net/ [2] https://github.com/endurabyte/FitEdit

rm7 281 days ago |

I currently use Windows Forms, but I plan to use the Godot game engine in the future. Designing the GUI feels quite similar to WinForms, and I can use C++ or C# (and a bunch of other languages).

adamhp 280 days ago |

Electron. I think the hate is undeserved (at this point, they've come along way) and there are plenty of billion dollar companies running Electron apps.

mvsingh 273 days ago |

Hey you can try NextBunny.co - It’s a Visual UI builder that exports real Next.js code.That means if you’re building a Nextjs desktop app you can design your UI visually in our builder, export clean code, and drop it right into your project. You own the code no hidden runtimes, no lock in. And It's free to use.

edtech_dev 281 days ago |

Avalonia - https://avaloniaui.net/

rubymamis 281 days ago |

I use Qt + QML (with C++) for my note-taking app[1] and my Ollama client[2] and it’s absolutely great.

[1] https://www.get-notes.com/

[2] https://www.get-vox.com/

_nhh 281 days ago |

C#, dotnet core and Avalonia. Its awesome

alkonaut 281 days ago |

.NET and whatever gui framework is appropriate (WPF, Avalonia, WinForms).

Rust + Egui for special cases like DAW plugins.

gwbennett 281 days ago |

For both iOS and Android app: - Xcode - SwiftUI - Supabase - Claude CLI - Skip.tools (converts SwiftUI to native Katlin code)

Been developing mobile apps for over 15 years. This is by far the best stack for developing mobile apps. Speed, total control, native UI's. Love it.

tra3 281 days ago | |

Is there a cross plaform desktop option for that?

hiAndrewQuinn 277 days ago |

I wouldn't necessarily recommend it, but I was pleasantly surprised to find out recently that cross-platform TUIs are trivial in Go with packages like tview. [1]

[1]: https://til.andrew-quinn.me/posts/cross-platform-tuis-are-ea...

diego_moita 281 days ago |

For Windows only (because that's the most common platform in the world): C# and .Net. The UI is mostly either WPF or WindowsForms.

For Mac only: new apps use Swift, legacy ones use Objective-C, both with AppKit.

Linux only: these are quite rare and there is a broad mix of them: C++, Java, etc.

Cross-platform: C++ with Qt seems to be the standard. Go and Rust seem to be rising. Rising UI libraries are Tauri, Slint and Iced. There are other alternatives like cross-platform .Net, Java or Flutter. But they don't look very solid and widely adopted.

Then there are other UI frameworks for some specific use cases (games, scientific applications, etc).

0xCE0 280 days ago |

This thread shows for itself the state of desktop app dev in 2025 :) The question was about "toolchains". For me, the word "toolchain" in the context of programming means compiler and linker stuff for some programming language(s) (e.g. LLVM toolchain, or MSVC++), not e.g. Chromium/HTML5 web environment, C#/Java managed languages, Flutter/Electron bloats, or Qt all-batteries-included library etc.

IntensiCode 275 days ago |

just stumbled across your post. i built two desktop apps a few weeks ago. well, vibe coded them. and i didnt think about it much. i used claude code and ask what lang/framework i should pick. "we" ended up with c/gtk. and this worked nicely for my cases. a pomodoro timer with ticking systray icon and screen darkening. and a vim-harpoon-style fzf window switcher with command mode.

but now i'm reading through all the comments here and am eager to try all these options. let's see how claude is doing with these.. :]

dabockster 274 days ago |

AI agents are making it really easy to develop in C/C++ and produce rock-solid memory safe code. Really looking forward to a new renaissance for desktop programming!

dev08979 281 days ago |

I support Java software using a Swing GUI. It's fairly performant, but requires a fair bit of boilerplate for setting up the GUI and can take longer than typical web development.

gisborne 281 days ago |

Flutter builds pretty decent desktop apps these days.

cmacleod4 280 days ago |

I'm retired now so I don't care what the market thinks. For applications I expect to be run locally by myself and/or a few other geeks, I use good old Tcl/Tk. For things where I'm aiming for a wider distribution I use plain html & javascript (no frameworks).

burkesquires 281 days ago |

I have used Xojo before and it is great. It is REALbasic rebranded and has been around for three decades. I used it years ago to write a LIMS interface (pre-Web 2.0). You can download the IDE and use it for free for Linux and Raspberry Pi projects. https://xojo.com

osm3000 281 days ago |

Because I mainly work with python, I am using Kivy (https://kivy.org/).

Earlier I was HTMX, Jinja templates, Flask, Tailwind and little vanilla JS. It was too inelegant for my taste.

I am considering moving to either Swift, or JS/Svelete

Numerlor 281 days ago |

For my own uses I do Python with PySide6, most Qt features in a bit easier environment

nik736 278 days ago |

Electron gets a lot of hate, but the web is the future and either a PWA or electron app are the easiest cross-platform way to deliver "installable" software.

vismit2000 281 days ago |

Quickshell was discussed earlier on HN today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44800048

adamnemecek 281 days ago |

I have been recently playing with Dioxus and I kinda like it. I too am dismayed that we are using browser to target desktop but here we are I guess.

alok-g 281 days ago | |

Thanks, I wasn't aware of it.

What would you think are the pros and cons over various alternatives (like Flutter, Avalonia, Lazarus, etc.)

Thanks.

self_awareness 281 days ago |

C++ and Qt.

Rust as a statically linked library where it makes sense.

eqvinox 281 days ago |

Python & Gtk (& sometimes Glade)

globalnode 281 days ago | |

Interesting, I think this is a good choice too if you want cross platform and to avoid potential future geopolitical issues that may crop up given the way the world is going.

eqvinox 281 days ago | | |

To be fair I haven't had reason to care about shipping for Windows yet (though I believe it's reasonably simple), only MacOS and Linux, and no mobile.

the__alchemist 280 days ago |

Rust/EGUI/WGPU

Caveat: This is immediate mode, so not suitable for all applications and preferences.

mariu52 281 days ago |

Rust for backend + Qt via cxx-qt bindings.

Would consider flutter for smaller apps as I had a great experience before.

billconan 276 days ago |

My current stack: Cocoa + Metal + imgui + CEF

tretiy3 281 days ago |

Rust bindings for GTK4 on Linux are full-fledged

the__alchemist 280 days ago | |

If you don't mind me asking: Why not use a cross-platform GUI kit? I feel like using something OS-specific is setting up barriers that we don't need to do anymore.

DougN7 281 days ago |

MFC all the way!

mahadali 281 days ago |

Zte the hack

uchechukw 280 days ago |

want to hack