Bitcoin Foundation Launches to ‘Standardize, Protect and Promote’ Bitcoin

Bitcoin Foundation Launches to ‘Standardize, Protect and Promote’ Bitcoin(betabeat.com)

89 points by nitashatiku 13 years ago | 27 comments

kiba 13 years ago |

Of course, the Linux Foundation is about promoting an operating system that has been largely marginalized

Bollocks. Linux has not been marginalized. It is dominating the server market, embedded devices, and smartphones in the form of android.

whereas the Bitcoin Foundation will work to promote a cryptocurrency sometimes used for blackmarket activity.

Haven't you heard? The dollars are used for black market activities too.

javert 13 years ago | |

I just want to clarify that kiba is criticizing the betabeat article, not the bitcoin devs.

Given that some core Bitcoin devs are also Linux kernel devs, they would not make the big mistake of saying that Linux is marginalized.

batgaijin 13 years ago | | |

That kernel/bitcoin link is something I haven't heard of and pretty interesting, do you have any sources?

tokenadult 13 years ago |

A while ago I wrote that perhaps the greatest contribution the Bitcoin experiment will make to humankind is to teach you and me and our neighbors more about the realities of economics. And now I will add that the Bitcoin experiment will also contribute to greater understanding of how nonprofit industry associations are organized to protect the economic interests of for-profit businesses. A lot of new industries have discovered that a few bad actors who screw up early can damage the reputation of the entire industry, and there are many previous examples of "competing" companies in a new industry banding together to promote consumer protection, as they say, and to promote the growth of their market. We'll see how this goes for Bitcoin.

andrewljohnson 13 years ago | |

"A lot of new industries have discovered that a few bad actors who screw up early can damage the reputation of the entire industry"

Please cite some examples. I can't come up with any, and this is intuitively false to me. Productive industries steamroll over bad actors and indiscretion. Railroads, gold-mining, and arguably social gaming were propelled by bad actors.

volts 13 years ago |

I think an encrypted currency base managed only by computers and the market is fairer than a system run by a few men. Also I like privacy.

wmf 13 years ago | |

I think it could be fairer or it could be a way to get stuck with a broken monetary policy forever.

TazeTSchnitzel 13 years ago | | |

Bitcoin can easily be forked and changed though.

javert 13 years ago | | |

The only monetary policy that isn't broken, is one that doesn't exist.

olalonde 13 years ago |

Here's a list of all the anonymous donations they have received so far (doesn't include membership donations): http://blockexplorer.com/address/1BTCorgHwCg6u2YSAWKgS17qUad... (currently 26.5 BTC)

vessenes 13 years ago | |

I hope we'll be publishing first-day membership numbers as well. My goal is to publish all our public keys. How cool would that be? Total financial transparency.

TazeTSchnitzel 13 years ago |

Here's their website:

https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/

runeks 13 years ago | |

Looks down from here :( (and here: http://www.isup.me/www.bitcoinfoundation.org)

TazeTSchnitzel 13 years ago | | |

So it is. They also have the domain http://www.bitcoinfoundation.com/ - but no luck.

jboggan 13 years ago |

Ah, the long-storied September announcement. Pretty good idea overall. I'd be happiest seeing a set of security best-practices agreed upon and some sort of mechanism for organizations and businesses to elect for auditing.

vessenes 13 years ago | |

Totally agreed; this and paying Gavin were my two main motivations upfront.

I really desire bitcointalk'ers to have some objective way to assess business quality when they consider how many percent per week return is a reasonable no-risk promise.