Cursor and Claude Opus 4.5 is a game changer The combination of the two delivers on the promise: fast and clever editing of multiple files in a codebase, with minimal human intervention. No other model I tried in Cursor comes even close. Question: did anyone tried Claude Codex: as good as Cursor? |
All these AI coding tools make me feel like I have superpowers. It’s addictive.
If I had problems finding time and the mental power or motivation to work on projects a few years ago—projects I deemed too large a commitment of time and effort—today with Claude and Cursor I almost have too much time and bandwidth to take on new projects.
When I step back and realize this is the world we’re living in as programmers, I can barely believe it. I want to shout and laugh from joy.
It’s been months since I’ve manually written more than a few lines of syntax, and I can’t imagine ever going back.
If AI coding tools disappeared from the world today, tomorrow I would stop being a programmer—something I’ve done for over 20 years.
I haven’t written any single line of code but i have been able to plan and come up with new ideas faster
I’m more of a product manager than a coder due to these new AI coding tools
Cursor and Claude are better than it now.
But I believe the mode of antigravity will continue to grow until it beyonds claude mode.
The agents coperation in antigravity has strong evolution potention
Do you mean codex or Claude code standalone without cursor? Codex is OpenAI’s coding tool competing with Claude.
Based on my limited experimentation Claude code is better. I haven’t used any of these coding agents with an ide only from the cli.
I hesitate trying Claude Code, there is a bit of fatigue installing new tools :-)
By the way: ChatGPT 5.1 Codex Max pro, which was rubbish when used directly inside Cursor, is actually very good once I access it via the OpenAI Codex extension installed within Cursor!
Mysteries of toolchains...
Anyway, that proved so useful when I maxed out my Claude credits.