A sea of sparks: Seeing radioactivity(maurycyz.com) |
A sea of sparks: Seeing radioactivity(maurycyz.com) |
You really have to get your eyes adjusted to the dark to see anything with the spinthariscope. It ends up looking mostly like static on a green crt, but if your only reference frame is a cloud chamber, the volume of particles that are emitted from such a weak source is pretty remarkable.
Imagine a planar array where each pixel gathers counts like an MCA (multichannel analyzer), mounted in some lead pinhole camera obscura.
This would give an extremely wide range of channels didactically illustrating the presence of calcium in gypsum (dryboard etc), visually show backscatter, etc.
Such pictures of modern and old city scenes would be mesmerizing to watch, partially seeing into buildings, the ground, ...
* https://www.ga.gov.au/bigobj/GA13928.pdf
* https://www.ga.gov.au/bigobj/GA18007.pdf
Visualising full 256 channel multispectral data can be tricky, the approach taken above was to take the raw data and process it to create a false colour RGB image representing the strength and interaction between natural background potassium, thorium, and uranium.
i made a small 3x3 proof of concept using more expensive geiger tubes, and their really long 'z-axis' lengths made 'traces' happen very often, like a persistent cloud chamber
trying to find a reliable semiconductor (read:cheaper) method i can scale to an arbitrary number of pixels, but something seems to happen in between the bench and the wall :(
I have considered
* scanning a linear array of BPW34 photodiodes, in a similar spirit to a scanner to cover a plane, each photodiode going to its own "MCA circuit" (TIA->cheap audio codec like those from Everest Semi). Either direct measurement of generated charge pulses or covering the photodiode with phosphor on aluminum foil or so
* cloud or bubble chamber (cloud chamber is less dense and will generate fewer events, so probably bubble chamber): instead of needing a large 2D or 1D array of parallel circuits, we image and track generated charged particles and use the trajectory starting end (less curved) to determine the source direction!
* consider X-ray crystallography, an incoming straight beam can diffract in many directions on a monocrystal. rotating say a silicon wafer, and measuring the incoming photon energies with one or more photodiode/MCA circuits we can assign a source likelihood distribution by keeping track of the orientation of the monocrystal. akin to sparse sampling but instead of masks its diffraction patterns.
If you have better ideas or variations in mind, let me know!
There's one in the Musée des Arts et Métiers in Paris — blew my mind!
[^1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_chamber
Edit: turns out people make these at home all the time. Sick!
- Dry ice (mine came from something shipped cold)
- Dark piece of metal (I used a 3D printer hot bed) on top of dry ice to get cold
- IPA vapour (I poured some on a shop towel)
- Some transparent container to house it all - I found a glass display cube on the side of the road, fish tanks or Tupperware also work.
- Torch or something to provide side lighting
Very cool to see evidence of the particles zooming around us, can highly recommend.
https://home.cern/news/news/experiments/how-make-your-own-cl...
https://hackaday.com/2019/01/13/see-the-radioactive-world-wi...
Chicago Peel 1 accomplished fission of fruit flies, which we felt was promising.
The subsequent banana nuclear bomb tests have been an unmitigated disaster. There are so many damn bananas in and around the bikini atolls, just nothing. Not even a fizzle. Mojave is littered with peels. Oppenheimer slipped and broke his leg.
Rumors are the Soviets are using avocados. Maybe that is the key. We are now constructing a demon core from an avocado split lengthwise.
Russians, South Africans, USAians, et al all run crews - we (Australia) have done Australia, Mali, other African regions, all of Fiji (many islands), India in May 1998 (the Pokhran-II nuclear test sites as they happened), and elsewhere.
The data is one thing, processing raw spectrometer data is a whole other thing - calibrations, corrections, dead time, etc.
See: Grasty / Minty GUIDE TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR AIRBORNE GAMMA−RAY SURVEYS https://www.ga.gov.au/bigobj/GA7667.pdf
The EUropean Radiological Data Exchange Platform (EURDEP) consists of data exchange mechanism and presentation website for radiological monitoring data which is collected and shared by 39 participating countries in almost REAL TIME.
Certainly useful for a mapping European normal background, the details under the hood could be a pain (types and formats of data, etc), it's historic and ongoing chronological data for distributed fixed points.
Their interactive public play map is normalised(?) raw total counts, _not_ a spectrum of gamma events bucketed by energy - ideally they are also recording and sharing full spectrum data at some stations in their network .. and making that publically available.
Of possile interest:
* https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-08-10/hedley-marston-marali...
Off hand, I'm not familiar with any public facing portals for downloading raw data.
Bear in mind, these are "snapshot" static, historic, broad area spectrum maps - they're not live, they won't show new leaks, changes, etc.
They are, however, "training data" for forming a kernel of a NASVD - Noise Adjusted Singular Value Decomposition - a bundle of all the major features of typical regular environmental radiation for some locale.
If you fly about or have an instrument taking live readings and subtracting a normalised background kernel .. you get the faint trace "weird arse stuff" lighting up instead of being buried.
Finland's the home of the NASVD author, the country used to run "find a barrel of waste" in a forrest compitions back in the day, they're adjacent to some radiometrically filthy submarine docks and pens just over a border.
The game goes thus - fly at about 70m/sec about 80m above the deck in some kind of frame carrying 30 to 40 litres of doped crystal packs .. and pick out a signature in near real time from one second spectrum windows.
They have data, I don't know about portals.
https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland/finland-news/domestic/2...
Can confirm, though, Cresco STOL's make a good platform: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_MO5Wfomks
yup after seeing #2 at a museum and learning about the chemistry needing to keep it running, i started looking for something like #1, but i'm not able to get any PIN diode circuit properly reporting events with consistency compared to my GM tubes :(
#3 sounds fun! i'd like to turn this into something i can open-source and hang on a wall, emitting x-rays might make it a hard sell :P
after reading about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-event_upset#SEUs_and_ci... , i'm wondering if it's possible to use a suitably dense FPGA in a complicated enough design that any failure must be due to cosmic effects? monitoring ECC might not be enough https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_memory#Concept
Do you have access to a high bandwidth oscilloscope? do you observe the expected exponentially decaying pulses? Sound like you could debug your circuit to find out what is happening.
For higher energies on would want to use a thicker intrinsic region, one approach I have considered would be to use a distant aperture, so that the direction of incoming rays is known, and then tilt the photodiode so that the rays can experience a much longer path in the intrinsic region (so that when a photon generates a high energy electron, the stopping length can be attained without clipping / aliasing the energy resolution as much). Basically tilt the photodiode so that its plane is closer to parallel (or exactly so). There is a trade off between cross section (fewer events) and maximum energy measurable, one can compensate for the lower cross section by having more photodiodes.
all 3 proposals would be passive, including #3, so it wouldn't emit X-rays, just detect them and build up a self-consistent picture that explains the observation statistics for each event (with that energy and time/orientation of the silicon wafer).
currently limited by my 20MHz scope (and free time...), but i saw the expected pulses after they were drawn out long enough by the amplification circuit to validate it was working on my desk (https://physicsopenlab.org/2020/06/15/cern-diy-particle-dete...), but i think my issue is shielding the diodes without introducing noise?
this guy has to actually shave away some part of the diode to make it work? https://hackaday.io/project/204159-geigerwatch-a-sensitiv-ra...
> this guy has to actually shave away some part of the diode to make it work? https://hackaday.io/project/204159-geigerwatch-a-sensitiv-ra...
Thats because he also wants to measure alpha and beta particles directly, if you are satisfied with high energy photons you wouldn't need to do that