Nah. It's just 15 years later they finally try to find a niche would also bring them monies. There are a lot of business who would just offload (yes, I did it too) the burden of compliance to a 3rd party - and this is the reason it's mentioned quite prominently there.

Good for them but they should had done this ten years ago.

They said bind mounts would still work. I didn't think those worked with remote engines.

Which also seems to imply the client software will expose your laptops filesystem to wherever docker is hosting the serverside piece of Offload.