The sentences seem coherent and the language register is sophisticated...but it just doesn't add up.

Guessing it's something about this flow club thing whatever that may be - some sort of context that the author has in his/her head that the reader does not.

AI won't think for you. It just (sort of) does work you delegate to it. It's from this perspective that you might get productivity gains, but the human in the loop is still the bottleneck. This doesn't mean you remove the human. It means the human decides how much they need AI.

There is no AI workflow that removes the human and magically does exactly what was intended. That's wishful thinking.