Show HN: Free OSS transcription app I made and found it's faster than wispr flow

Show HN: Free OSS transcription app I made and found it's faster than wispr flow(mumbli.app)

6 points by fireharp 22 days ago | 2 comments

title doesn't let nuance, ofc it's not the app that's faster but the way you can use it with Groq inference for example.

wunderlotus 22 days ago |

what is the value prop of mumbli vs the myriad of OSS STT tools that already exist like handy [1], hex [2], ghostpepper [3], OpenWhispr [4], any of the ones listed here [5] or here [6]?

[1] - https://github.com/cjpais/Handy

[2] - https://github.com/kitlangton/Hex

[3] - https://github.com/matthartman/ghost-pepper

[4] - https://github.com/OpenWhispr/openwhispr

[5] - https://github.com/FluidInference/FluidAudio#showcase

[6] - https://opensource.builders/alternatives/superwhisper

PS. have you seen this? https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLM/comments/1r7bohc/macos_bui... your landing page reminded me of it.

fireharp 22 days ago | |

I'm not sure if there is a strong value proposition here. It is more of an exercise. Few hours of joy doing smth :)

I’m not a designer either. I basically took Claude Design, and practiced a little bit.

For me, as an engineer who doesn’t really do design at all, it feels pretty reasonable. Recently I would usually just take Tailwind and some decent default component set, like shadcn, and build from there. Now I can do a reasonable version myself with Claude, which is cool.