Fame! A Misunderstanding: A new translation of Albert Camus's complete notebooks

Fame! A Misunderstanding: A new translation of Albert Camus's complete notebooks(lareviewofbooks.org)

55 points by Caiero 4 days ago | 11 comments

dmbche 1 day ago |

Are the french also misunderstanding Camus?

linschn 1 day ago | |

Given that some far right public figures are using him more and more, I'd say they do. Same goes for Gramsci.

I tried reading Myth of Sisyphus by Camus recently. I found it tedious and boring. Sort of a rehash of stoic and Taoist teaching. Yes embrace the absurd but sooo long winded. Has anyone else read this, am I missing something?

linschn 1 day ago | |

To really enjoy the book, stop reading at the last chapter, and go back at the beginning. Then imagine yourself happy doing so.

number6 1 day ago | |

It is very methodical. Starting out on why you shouldn't kill yourself, as a real debate. And yes all the arguments have been made before. He tries to build up from first principals. I think he tried to walk a fine line between the physical suicide and the philosophical suicide.

brokegrammer 1 day ago | |

The Stranger is good, but I have trouble stick with his other works past the first few chapters because of the tedious and boring aspects you mentioned.

I was never a fan of French literature to begin with, so that might have something to do with it.

B1FF_PSUVM 1 day ago |

(Camus quoted)

He will hereafter be known (and forgotten) not for what he is, but for the picture that a hurried journalist has given of him. To make a name for oneself in the literary world, it is no longer necessary to write many books. It suffices to have written one that the evening newspapers have talked about and on which the writer’s reputation will henceforth rest.

Ah, the days of morning and evening newspapers... A foreign country, they do things differently there.

(I also find fascinating those early XX century English letters/bios where Londoners send invitations by mail in the morning and get replies after lunch. Take that WhatsApp )

mananaysiempre 1 day ago | |

Fascinating in more than one way: I don’t think I’ve ever seen mail delivered on the same day within the same city even when my place of residence had a well-functioning postal service by modern standards. (What I have seen in a particularly egregious case, though, is letters reliably taking a month to traverse a distance that takes me half an hour on foot.)

lloydatkinson 1 day ago | | |

I've been told that it was once common in the UK to be able to send an early morning letter and have a reply in your letter box by afternoon. Now, I have Post Office workers graffitiing envelopes and changing the type of postage I just paid for once I've left the Post Office, letters going missing regularly, a couple of stamps costs £10, and first class can take a week. It's now got so bad that we hand delivered cards over Christmas.

Absolutely pitiful.

stevenwoo 1 day ago | |

Even in the day when all communications were slower by post or hand delivered messages, George Eliot wrote a joke about people not responding quick enough in Middlemarch "The bias of human nature to be slow in correspondence triumphs even over the present quickening in the general pace of things..."