Isn't dreary and mundane stuff exactly the sort of stuff that should be automated, so people can concentrate on the interesting/exciting aspects of their job? Some (not all) kinds of AI boosters seem to have this idea that AI's optimal use is to replace all the high value jobs for cheap, leaving humans with the 'low value' drudgery for which they can be paid less.

The only thing that backs up the headline is a single sentence ("An AI consultant tells Axios one of their clients recently spent half a billion dollars in a single month after failing to put usage limits on Claude licenses for employees.") with no sourcing or elaboration.

Quite ironic seeing as AWS had bitten many companies in the ass over the years. Karma, baby!

Let them sue for non-payment, they will get nothing, parasites.