> These are not diplomatic talking points. They are factories, laboratories and payrolls.
> not communiques, not summits, but signed agreements
> These are not vague aspirations. They are the technical and regulatory arenas where …
> The Technology Prosperity Deal is a framework, not a result.
I can’t tell if these are AI tics or not, and that alone is very annoying. The anxiety of not knowing whether you’re reading the result of someone else’s hard reporting work, or being fed algorithmic content from a machine.
We really need some form of universal “AI-assisted” stamp on all published content, like some platforms already do for images.
It's just a fact of being a writer. Sounding like AI is the big current problem, but it's hardly new.
A big awkward one is politics; Certain turns of phrase and idioms are used exclusively in certain in-groups and a novice writer can easily blunder their way into sounding like a nazi if they're not careful.
If this is AI, I’m impressed by the amount of detail-sprinkling it’s throwing in.
This is a commentary piece, not news
Oh yes it does. The US wants to use Sweden to supply the EU, after they push for banning of all chinese equipment, and Sweden needs american military assurances.
US is creating all kinds of 'corridors' for american exports, including LNG corridor in south europe, despite all the anti-EU rhetoric.
I also don't think the US leadership has any plans for Sweden in particular, this is more likely the result of a top down directive to the US MFA to sign tech deals "in Europe" and signing something with Sweden just happened to line up nicely with the calendar for other reasons.