1worldflag: A blue dot on a transparent background(1worldflag.com) |
1worldflag: A blue dot on a transparent background(1worldflag.com) |
White outline around the clear field w blue dot?
Flags don’t exist for the period where they’re gaining recognition. Compromising the significance of the iconography for the temporary gain of not being misidentified during the period it isn’t recognisable would just mean if it gains recognition it will forever be less than it could be.
In other words, with flags you need to play to win, not to survive. Better that the attempt have a higher risk of failure with a great flag than a lower risk with a mediocre flag.
The pale blue dot is an excellent way to represent a global outlook and “we’re all in it together”, not sure I can think of a better pedigree for this concept. I’d perhaps have been tempted to make it a smaller blue dot, but flags do need to be recognised at a distance, so it can’t be too much smaller.
Also, can we please make it "pop"?
ps. Attaching a version I made, and this took a lot of back and forth with chatgpt because I care about this a lot, so please have a look, I think we are close to something great here!
Looking forward to seeing more from you!
ps2. when I was about to send our manufacturing guy entered the room and he said the transparency could be a problem. Some alternatives without compromising the idea would be great! They must be cheap but elegant! Thank you!!
Could you please clarify which ones? I'm planning my escape, but it seems that even lightspeed wouldn't be enough to colonize anything suitable.
I reckon the actual color doesn't matter as long as it's blue-ish. There are no branding guidelines or anything. Even the size of the circle is unspecified, which IMO is a feature, not a bug. It's accessible :)
EDIT: I'm incorrect, there is a spec. Whelp! I still like my imagined more-flexible version of the flag.
This website reminds me of the early 90s internet because of the specific shade of blue they picked.
It's just a way of saying that you're too good for your neighbors. That's why it would appeal to liberals and libertarians alike.
Let’s try an earth and a sunrise behind it - half a circle sitting on the bottom of the rectangle, and a yellow circle making a sunrise on top of that, like a yolk sitting on a blue egg.
It's encouraging I didn't get downvoted as much as I expected I would.
My personal utopian take: smaller communities/city-states that would naturally coalesce into more fluid confederations. A lot of these communities could also be distributed and non-local.
Pride flags.
Edit: Also the Esperanto Flag.
hung out directly with national, corporate, municipal flags,are you kidding me?
ALL flags are teritorial/tribal declarations with violence (police,security), as the ONLY default response to a challenge
so what? exactly? will happen if someone makes a habit of pulling down "pride" flags?
what most don't agree with: what happens next?
Fun fact. Just people who live in a shitty country want that, maybe instead of change everyone else, change you own country?
Continue with the scold though, very convincing argument so far.
Are the vast majority happy? = Good one
If not = Shitty
Example? Norway[1] = good, Sudan[2] = really..really shitty
[1] https://www.bi.no/en/research/business-review/articles/2025/...
[2] https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/2025/sudan-voices/
To be honest, those two are so far apart it's not even comparable.
I will certainly not. And even if I did — within any reachable radius there's nothing actually suitable, everything is 10+ ly away, but maybe I missed something.
A lot of countries claim that. I think that can only work at a small scale.
> I want really small, face to face responsible governments
We are not that different :)
Compared to what?
But there is no "we are the world, we are the children", future is probably more like US/EU/EAU (east asia union), now you have 3 big blocks fighting against each other (much higher world-ending chance). More power = more bully....
>everything that’s really important.
Yes your right, and talking...even with a enemy should be considered the base for future world-freedom.
It's just massively frustrating to see what humanity could accomplish if we weren't occupied bashing our heads in over religion, nationality, or color of skin. The planet - the only planet - is dying, people and animals are suffering, and the news are dominated by a particular clown and his circus. It's really unbearable sometimes.
Oh man you speak from my heart, it's like we live on a star-ship, but everyone looks just at their own room instead of steering the ship into a better future.
EDIT: However, as we see a shift from the UN (as a future captain?) to NATO (at least in the so called "West"), i see dark times ahead of us.
Resenting the real world because it doesn't live up to your make-believe fantasy world is pathological. I too can imagine perfect utopian worlds where everybody lives in peace and harmony, but they're just fantasies. Eventually you have to come back to the real world and learn to accept the harsh truths of the reality you find yourself inhabiting.
Edit: And honestly, I find it a bit pathological to take the sentence you quoted upfront and not feeling similar resentment against those things. Granted, Humans are a belligerent species, but just shrugging these things away is really not an acceptable stance either.
I dont think world-peace (more or less) is impossible, even if it's more like "Brave New World" instead of "1984".
Or maybe something like the UN with a strong peace-force and WITHOUT a security council but a real and fair democratic decision process.
And maybe the most important point, i have not seen real War-Winners (except the mil.-industrial-blabla) since the 2. World-war....just losers on both sides.
I don't know why I feel so much contempt for people like you. I kinda get it, you want to feel intellectually superior. You're the reasonable one, the adult in the room, etc. but seriously bro, this reality is so fucking harsh. What keeps you going? Why are you still here and going through with it?
Carcinization will fix that eventually. And then Roko's Crabulisk will hunt down everyone who didn't vote for the crab flag.
https://phys.org/news/2025-07-mammals-evolved-ant-eaters-din...
It's about a guy who has been fighting for ~50 years to be able to be a citizen of no country. I left that episode thinking "This is the hero we need right now."
He has set up the World Citizen Government https://worldcitizengov.org/
So, nice idea, but completely impractical, which makes it a gimmick.
I'd definitely take that into consideration for a digital version.
Finally, an application for Apple‘s Liquid Glass UI
Edit: From Wikipedia: (A white flag) serves as an internationally recognized sign of truce and negotiation, meaning "we want to talk". It emerged as an ideal symbol for peace because it is highly visible on the battlefield, is easy to make, and doesn't belong to any specific nation.
A world flag should not use flags which were associated with a country. Evan this proposal is too derivative of the Japanese flag.
Nevertheless, I think the Earth flag should include the moon too. A blue Earth, a white Moon, and a black background. When the Moon secession war starts, the laser holes in the flag could double as the starry sky.
And it will be.
> and the fact we embraced it as a flag of unity over a flag of surrender should say all there is to say about us getting over our differences
We see so many examples of power hurting citizens in existing nations. The risk if the entire world had one political unity, of losing freedom, is extreme.
With multiple nations and blocs, at least some remain showing an example of what can exist in the others.
The blue dot seems to make sense as it represents the world without focusing on one perspective or projection of the world map. The transparent background also makes sense for the flag, but I think it would be more recognizable if it was just a white background (in my mind the default flag background).
Also it seems to me transparent materials are in general more polluting. On the website it mentions a black background was considered (I suppose representing space). It would be nice if there was an alternative version chosen without the transparency for mediums where transparency is not an option either black or white would suffice imho.
As others mentioned it does seem very similar (same proportions) as the Japanese flag. I wonder what the opinion of the Japanese is on this concept.
Nowadays blue is easy and common in flags, and much else, so this flag design is high tech.
People have been speculating on his reddit subs, but honestly anything from early retirement, to stay at home dad, to sabbatical, to serious illness is completely possible. The parasociality of everything has probably gotten old over time, too.
Currently, Japan’s ruling party, the LDP, is considering legislation to criminalize the desecration of the Japan flag. If that law is passed, carrying that flag would constitute a crime of desecrating the Japan flag. Even without such a law, simply carrying that flag would likely prompt the far right to view it as an alteration of the Japan flag and attack you for it.
- LDP pushes flag desecration law; expert questions its necessity | The Asahi Shimbun: Breaking News, Japan News and Analysis: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/16506155
However that one looks better: https://www.flagofplanetearth.com/
Fight me :)
Usually the unity of some humans against other humns.
But the transparency :( It makes the whole flag low contrast, an undesirable quality in flags.
Instead of cool cool water make it an income distribution chart. More realistic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_symbols#/media/File%...
Well, there are quite a lot of ants in the world, so I guess it makes sense.
Also this flag has square corners.
What a great way to unite the world in a practice of cruelty to its inhabitants
- 1worldforhumansonlyflag - 1worldindifferenttosufferingflag
The whole idea falls flat on its face because of this for me.