> prioritizing security and hardware that's capable of running local AI models.

Just like the Googlebooks do. It seems everybody is heading in the same direction. Apple already does it. Their high end M4 chips with the 512 bit RAM busses are bigger than the 256 bit planned for the next generation of high end Intel and NVIDIA chips.

The light at the end of the tunnel is very bright now, but I still don't know if it's a train.

Ideally there would have been about ten years of concentrated effort using more quality control techniques than ever, on Windows itself beforehand.

Unfortunately the platform has gotten less reliable instead and there's now more than 10 years of catching up before it would be perfect enough for AI to even begin to make the most of it.

From what I have seen, AI will leverage the imperfections to a greater degree than the residual perfect behavior, not unlike real human agents.

This looks comically out of touch. Most people without tech CEO brain don't want their whole computing experience to basically be OpenClaw.

> "The idea: I could be traveling and on the phone, and text my PC, and ask my PC to get coding done"

Who asked for this? Who wants this?