RIS is happening across all OS levels, if the keynote is to be believed.
In any case I would have liked to have more info during the deep dive sessions.
As it is, Meet with Apple on security (a 5h long event) had much more information.
https://faultlore.com/blah/swift-abi/ (written by a core Rust developer)
[1] apart from the basic/universal C one, which prevents exposing any useful Rust semantics over the interface
Rust is also just a more complex language. I’m not convinced the benefits would have been worth it.
The gap between the two languages is quite small, it just makes me wish Apple was also all-in on Rust
I'm not sure what became of it and if it ever shipped. If anyone knows I'd be curious.
It looks like this hinter will be used only in rendering PDFs, because that's where they test the performance.
https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-laptops/dell-15-laptop/...
It is very, very common. Just not in the Mac world.
To me, it's more about what I'm used to. I have a perfectly fine several years-old monitor, so why should I throw it away?
It worries me. I hope Codex adoption picks up there.
But I personally reviewed every line that shipped and was absolutely insufferable about testing.
Apache2's license I've heard described as mutually-assured-patent-destruction - if you use the code and make a patent claim, your rights to use the code go away.
So Apache2 offers little benefit here, and MIT may get it into more hands?