The article seems to be a little one-sided, perhaps?

Now that Cloudflare Email is out of beta someone should build a self hostable serverless email stack based on it. Then we can deploy our own email with reliable delivery, but own our own data and only pay for actual usage as well.

OK but can we make a list of all the companies and media that do back stuff like, say, 1200 civilians getting raped, killed and/or made hostages on Oct 7th and that happen to be the exact same turning a complete blind eye on the islamist in Iran killing 30 000 of their own in a few days?

Why is it always upvoted for articles about Israel and its genocide in Gaza, but never ever about those siding with the islamists in Iran or siding with the islamists of Hamas?

BTW... I'm not jewish, I'm no zionist.. but how would you react if islamists came and raped your teenager daughters and refused to release hostages and vowed to erase your country from the surface of the globe? What would your response be to that?

I can understand the "evil israel" angle. What I don't understand though is the "peaceful islamists" angle.

And weirdly enough, in a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" style, is typically the exact same people.

There are many evils in this world. Why aren't you fighting so that an islamist regime doesn't murder 30 000 of its own and hang public athletes in the street?

How are you picking your fights? 1200 deaths on Oct 7th: not worth a fight. 30 000+ deaths in Iran by islamists: not worth a fight. 45 000 death in Gaza: worth a fight?

I find that very dubious, seen that it looks to me the 30 000 people brutally murdered by islamists didn't celebrate the rape and murder of 1200 civilians by their beloved leader from Hamas!?

Can you explain how your mind works? Gaza good / Israel bad (so we don't care about 1200 deaths) / Iran we don't give a fuck.