> Fyve faded. Gin kept going.

> the honest version of web programming: no magic, explicit control flow, and a handler shape you can hold in your head.

> keep the request path explicit, run no reflection there, and put the boring work behind one object you can inspect: the Context.

> None of it is hard. Enough of it becomes noise.

> we didn’t rename ours — we made gin.Context satisfy the standard interface, adding full compatibility

> Params land in a small slice, the matched handler is already sitting on the final node, and the request path avoids reflection.

LLMs tend to write in this style full of short sentences or phrases separated by commas.

It's actually hard to understand what the point is at times:

> The work follows the length of the URL, not the number of routes registered in the app.

> That is the kind of performance work I trust: fewer operations on the hot path, and fewer concepts in the programmer’s head.

> The quiet goal was zero breaking changes.

Adjectives such as "honest" and "quiet" are LLM tells.

I'm mainly building tooling in other runtimes like Rust and TS, and I'm interested to hear your take on it.

Classic talk that still influences my design decisions today.

Plenty of people who struggle with alcohol and who would benefit of not being reminded of it at work too.

As a human, I would have written something like: > You write the same plumbing for route params, request parsing, validation, and responses in handler after handler. None of it is hard, but it makes the code noisy.

Whether or not an LLM wrote this, it's a writing style that sounds like a politician or a sophist, and it sucks.