Beyond Red vs. Blue: the US Political Typology(pewresearch.org) |
Beyond Red vs. Blue: the US Political Typology(pewresearch.org) |
I’d argue it’s incredibly helpful.
I live in a state with a couple contentious elections coming up. Something I’ve noticed is no one seems to have anything to say regarding these elections.
It’s fucking bleak. Every discussion I see ends with swaths of old boomers stating how they know absolutely nothing about the candidate, their positions or views, but intend to vote for them simply because of the associated “blue” or “red”. It’s “vote blue no matter who” or “trvst the plan” low IQ idiocy.
I hate the left/right, blue/red, whatever dichotomy. I think it’s weak and it’s rarely held when having real discussions with real people, but when it comes to voting I don’t think anything but that dichotomy matters anymore.
We just had the primary where I live last month. Along with that were several local nonpartisan elections: school board, Mayor, City council, etc. It's almost impossible to determine what the candidates actually want to do once elected. It's all buzzwords, and the most bland garbage statements.
What does "we need to deal with the homelessness crisis" mean? Does it mean we need to round up the homeless and ship them out of town, or does it mean we need to make it easier to build more homes? Or does it mean "once I'm elected I'll start studying it"? No way to tell from what the candidates say.
I'd love to find out what candidates actually think about the various issues, and what they plan to do once in office, but party affiliation is pretty much all we have most of the time.
It's not an endorsement of not knowing what people stand for.