I'm begging people to take the time to write things themselves rather than getting Claude to write for them.
If you want human effort from readers, please put in human effort while writing.
Once a company enters a steady flow, usually after the first 2-3 years, this is not a problem because it has the income of previous years. The only thing that changes is the difference in the company's turnover.
This type of loan is not new, it has existed for more than 70 years. There’s something similar for wine, prosciutto, oil and other types of cheese.
https://www.google.com/search?q=agricultural+products+as+col...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/rural-news/2015-08-22/bank...
and in 2009 from the USDA: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadRepo...
I would also note that the original URL in OP's post seems like some kind of content blog/click farm, so some of the top ten URLs in the google results from actual known large news media might be more legit.
To me this looks like AI: https://travelandtannins.com/author/maya/
https://www.google.com/search?q=travel+and+tannins+maya+lint...
TL;DR: No surprise to anybody .... loans involve two parties, and shockingly (/s) its up to the bank what they take as collateral !
Lombard loans have been a thing ever since banks have existed and – ironically in the case of this blog post – the term originates from the Lombards who conquered the northern region of Italy now known as Lombardy.
In the case of this blog its cheese. But it is incredibly common - for example - for the loan collateral to be an investment portfolio.
As long as there is an accepted way to value it, correctly manage it and it has a good chance of holding or increasing its value, banks can consider it as collateral. Doesn't mean they will (that is a decision for the risk committee), but they can.