Kimi Work attaches raw agent sessions to feedback reports

18 points by ryanmerket 23 hours ago | 4 comments

I reverse engineered the latest Kimi Work desktop app just for fun, I know I'm a nerd.

Anyway, I found something a bit concerning: when you send a feedback report, it attaches the 5 latest sessions to the report with no notice or heads up or anything.

These sessions could have ANYTHING in them, and you have no idea you're sending it all to Kimi.

I emailed them to give them a heads up, but just wanted to let yall know incase you're using Kimi.

URL: https://runtimewire.com/article/scoop-kimi-work-secretly-att...

wren6991 2 hours ago |

> Why It Matters

Thanks Claude, the analysis looks to be load-bearing, and dare I say the gun may be smoking. This sharpens the framing considerably.

Honest caveat: most AI providers' privacy policies have an explicit carve-out for feedback. (Uploading the last 5 sessions wholesale is pretty wild though.)

trjordan 2 hours ago | |

FWIW, this particular header in news articles is a deliberate choice originated by Axios. It’s notable enough and effective enough they wrote a book about it.

https://www.axios.com/smart-brevity

Did Claude write this article? Probably. But this style of article is exactly what you’d expect from a pre-AI version of this website as well.

chvid 1 hour ago | | |

It goes back way earlier than Axios.

bbg2401 2 hours ago |

You’ve submitted nearly 100 AI written articles from this source in the past 40 days…

ryanmerket 19 minutes ago | |

Yes and I'm having a blast, being semi-retired and reporting the news before anyone esle. Heck, even Wired covered my insane levels of reporting.

fishfasell 2 hours ago | |

AI has completely killed blogs for me, I don't bother anymore unless I'm familiar with the blog from years before.

cautiouscat 1 hour ago | | |

I feel the same way but don’t let some bad blogs dissuade you from others IMO. You can tell pretty quickly if the author cares enough to write it themselves or have an agent do it.