Your AGENTS.md file doesn't do anything(pivot-to-ai.com) |
Your AGENTS.md file doesn't do anything(pivot-to-ai.com) |
A simple instruction in AGENTS.md fixed that.
Before LLMs, I found "mostly works" systems like this to be incredibly sketchy and not worth using. The main thing I've had to learn in this past year is that what I thought was an ironclad rule turned out to be only a heuristic that was useful before but not always helpful, because empircally as much as I might find the lack of determinism jarring, in practice these tools are genuinely good enough at what they do to be worthwhile to use, as long as you're making sure not to use them in ways that the occasional failure costs more than just some wasted time.
I have not even really needed a formal memory system. If I see an error happen more than once, I just say "hey add a note on this to agents.md". Tends to be verbose but overall works quite well for the projects I am doing.
For Python, I have the agent use `uv` (even for direct script invocations) so that the agent doesn't need to burn tokens concerning itself with the details that `uv` is managing behind the scenes.
That's fine. Do what you do. But don't read this article as any sort of science. It's massively opinionated rage-bait.
Still, I agree it doesn't make much sense to only talk about who's writing the content instead of the content. Perhaps, generously, the other comments covered their opinions on fhat part already.
Someone betting—sorry, investing in a prediction market—means you can have even more confidence in their convictions.
But someone having a Patreon account for people to voluntarily donate money to them means they can't be trusted.
I think there is overall something here for current Claude which is there appears to be a hierarchy of conformance that breaks progressive disclosure and the utility of skills. It seems to honor the system prompt, user instructions, tool call results, and dead last skills. It applies a large amount of discretion as to whether to honor what skills say in the imperative and progressive disclosure seems to have at best a 20-30% recall. Other models like codex gpt 5.6 seem to be the exact opposite and slavishly adhere to the Agent/skills/plugins, to the point of being wasteful and dangerous. It feels clear there’s a tension being RL’ed around between conformance and skeptical behavior that neither has quite found the balance for yet, and is almost certainly an over constrained problem. I just find it funny Anthropic is the one you can’t trust with your wallet while OpenAI does precisely what you and your harness tell it to.
But this “science” and its editorializing are based on flawed techniques, don’t lead to the conclusion let alone the editorialized extrapolation, and are l
> That's fine. Do what you do.
I work on several projects on the side, and they all have agents files that give the context about what the project is, what the elements of it are, and what things we're typically working on. This allows my initial prompt to reference things that would otherwise not be in the context at all.
I mean, they're not magic, they're just some automatic context that's supplied. I feel like the study is trying to say that context with an LLM doesn't matter, which is obviously not a tractable position to hold.
The fact that they generated all the agents files instead of curating them with a human is probably part of the problem.
All the scripts are designed to bail quickly. They all create a log in the background instead of blocking. They're all annotated with the necessary comments to keep it on path and locate files, track pratfalls, etc.
So any entrypoint to whatever I'm doing typically starts with one of these scripts. It's heavy handed but orientating your agent for the specific task is better than just dumping a whole set of context that will be ignored if it has nothing to do with your very next command.
Telling it how to do a pull request isn't going to help if you're trying to debug a technical issue.
I added one when it kept making the same mistake and using things from the wrong library version making compiler errors, adding in the common mistakes pre emptively.
Knowing he did an AI hate interview with Tante just solidifies this: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/08/21/tante-on-ai-when-this-thi...
Just looking through his Mastodon reposts (neovim is "fascist software" if you didn't know already!) just leaves me shaking my head.
Incredible how much of an audience you can get by just being anti "the latest hype".
- Don't vibe you agents.md file, it won't capture any intuition about the project that the model doesn't already have.
- Keep your agents.md file short. Long ones mostly bloat context for minimal difference in behavior.
- Writing for a human audience is probably better. Any LLM can read docs made for humans anyways.
Either way, you get no visibility or predictability.
Good luck.