Even inspecting the gold to see it was there was apparently too much: https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-politici... with inspections first being refused, then being allowed only to see the entrance to the safe, then only allowed to see one of nine rooms containing the gold, and to look at a small few, but not all gold bars.
I’m sure there’s a perfectly innocent explanation.
[1] France pulls last gold held in US (361 comments):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Pr...
https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-suggests-he-can-use-...
Explains a lot, lmao.
I’m not saying it’s right, I’m just saying it is what it is.
According to the HN guidelines:
"Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."
That's of course also why a little bit was taken out of Canada.
New York 31.3% 18.5% −12.8 pp
Ottawa 19.7% 18.5% −1.2 pp
London 18.1% 32.1% +14.0 pp
Zeist 30.8% 30.8% 0 pp
Seems it is mostly because there was less trust in the USA, and added a little bit from Canada to make it less obvious.
> Before the deployment, the Dutch bank held 31.3% of its gold in New York and 19.7% in Ottawa.
> After the move, each country accounted for 18.5% of the Dutch gold reserve.
The idea of repatriating it comes up from time to time, but the truth is that it's s logistical and diplomatic trouble with little positive outcomes.
I'd vote for it if I was Italian.
https://images.cdn.nos.nl/1/4/H/9/t/9/6kexFuRByv6prhDGJSyWt3...
Yeah, first we'd have to prove that any of our politicians can even define the word 'diplomacy', then we'd have to prove that they'd be willing to actually try diplomacy before resorting instantly to pathetic attempts at bullying.
I wish a reporter would ask him what question he heard and answered, because I'm sure he would be unable to correctly answer.
People are not quite sure, but Krugamn (for one) is willing to fight: