S.F. Democratic Party stands behind Flock surveillance cameras in vote(missionlocal.org) |
S.F. Democratic Party stands behind Flock surveillance cameras in vote(missionlocal.org) |
If the abolition movement wants progress we should start throwing white collar criminals that allow this to happen in prison. See how quickly those with power will start considering transformative/restorative justice alternatives
We already have laws making a lot of what Flock does illegal. We just don't enforce them
What we do need is the death penalty to corporations. Reap them, take their cash and tell shareholders to do their due diligence when investing in criminal activities.
Why we keep protecting corporations just because there's a piece of paper that claims to do XYZ is such a bizarre world.
I expect the Supreme Court to eventually rule on the constitutionality of mass surveillance of public places, at least by the government. Maybe also by random citizens.
Personally I think people should start taking them personally to court via class action lawsuits. Prison would be a bonus, but crushing them financially would be the most effective.
https://www.instagram.com/p/Daf9d_7mh22/?img_index=2
I know SF supervising has 0 to do with the Middle East. But if he thinks like this about groups he doesn't like, what about when one of his constituents is part of a group he doesn't like?
Also crazy that 2 of the 20-ish members were employees of Flock and allowed to vote on this
The only appropriate response to this is "What the fuck?"
> Last month, the San Francisco Standard reported that a prior version of Mar’s resolution was removed from the party’s agenda by a subcommittee chaired by Ho.
> The committee does not have rules related to conflicts of interest for issues like this one, Tung told Mar. They then proceeded to count both Ho and Chandler’s votes.
Dammit
Voting for flock cameras right now though? That seems impossibly tone deaf to me.
I would have thought the politico playbook would be to stay quiet on the issue, then sneakily swap in a flock alternative AI camera company while loudly heralding how awesome you are for removing the flock menace. Boiled frogs applaud. On to the next 15 seconds of outrage (datacenters I assume :) )
Doesn't seem like it: https://abcnews.com/International/report-london-safer-cctv-c...
In any case, recovery rate is the other important metric here especially for justifying a surveillance state, and that has been absolutely terrible.
Robbery is theft using force or the immediate threat of force. The article you linked to says that much of the phone theft is done by pickpocketing.