In any case, I don't know who they would choose to debate the case but I am sure there are knowledgeable experts on both side outside of commercial interest. People who own Ai stocks are definitely not qualified.
You could argue that there is significant overlap between the first two but I think politicians are worth distinguishing because a) how ignorant they tend to be and b) they have significantly more influence.
People really need to start listening to the people who built these things and don’t stand to gain monetarily. It’s like ignoring climate change but potentially somehow worse.