It's easy: The choice was made from someone else, and you just accepted it as normal. Hardware vendors shipping PC's with Windows 11, corporations who went all in to Microsoft's tooling shove Microsoft Teams down your throat because "the company uses it", and the list goes on.
[1] https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-...
But they do let me visit blog.codeberg.org
edit: looks like this was originally the case and then they moved?
Educating oneself to provide better quality of work still requires writing code by hand, and by extend is an achievement of merit.
There is no point in being on the extreme end about banning any code generated by AI.
Regardless, there is AI generated code in many repositories on Codeberg anyway.
> DAWO Core has moved from https://code.overheid.nl to Codeberg to facilitate community collaboration.
The same applies here, is it really "more open" to allow corporations to profit by removing the openness of your work?
They're targeting slop and essentially spam, not everything that could possibly have been built by LLMs.
> If you see yourself on this list, you don't need to move right away, but
there might be other places that better fit your needs:
- Projects written and maintained with heavy use of LLMs
All of the commits I browsed here seem to be LLM-assisted, so these projects are in this category. The policy being fuzzy is in itself a problem - "likely to be tolerated" is not a great policy to have your entire government depend on.Personally, the refusal on "Projects heavily tied to the LLM ecosystem, e.g. LLM-written tools to ease LLM usage" is enough reason, as that's a good chunk of what I've been working on.
In the same space, also check out openDesk initiated by the German Government (https://www.opendesk.eu/en) and La Suite by the French one (https://lasuite.numerique.gouv.fr/).
AFAIK, there has been some collaboration with the German government on La Suite, not sure about the others.
"NixOS is a Linux distribution where your whole system is defined in one configuration file."
I didn't get that from looking at their website...
Probably has its uses, tried it twice myself and both times were a lot of struggling.
For me even Arch was easier to configure than Nix.
When lesser nations rally around the flag and elect dictators we have meetings and consultations.
www.dawo.community took too long to respond.
* typical deployments
* training/consulting
* compliance with Ditch regulations
* shared infrastructure for custom builds, and CVEs
It amuses me that Mastodon Central uses corpo-friendly labels for the sites they won't federate with, e.g. (https://mastodon.social/about)
tsundere.love Suspended (Hate speech)
you**.**ve Suspended (Inappropriate content)
Whereas the more free-wheeling sites, like the ones Mastodon Central blogs, tell it exactly how it is: (https://tsundere.love/about) nadeko.pw CP
mk.fedcast.ch Spam
youjo.love hosts at least one admitted pedo- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/59 ("[FEAT] implement federation")
Keep huffing that copium my friend. I've set an alarm to follow up here in a couple of years.