1. The audio only established the set-pieces but didn't actually even gave the glimpse of the whole essay, what I did get a glimpse of was the highly rhetoric sense in which it was presented.
2. The audio ended abruptly, at the world literally, meaning, it was a half effort at making an audio preview, and there was no quality check, which I would expect, if the site is not that popular.
In one sentence, I'm interested to know what truth is, but I wasn't actually given a glimpse of his views on truth.
Apart this, I would like to wish them luck in their efforts, seems like a good platform with a unique approach to podcast. But somehow I felt, that it would take more than that to draw me (a last.fm fan) just yet.
But you points about the way the preview is edited are well taken.