Our approach to EU text provenance rules(openai.com) |
Our approach to EU text provenance rules(openai.com) |
> Claude/codex/deepseek, please replace 25% of words with synonyms or slight rephrasing because i dont like the current version.
Not sure if that counts as: `a solution that's robust against "common alterations and adversarial attacks"`. Is there a sort of adversarial attack that is more common?
Sent from my iPhone (harm prevention watermark)
You might also want to consider that many believe the current AI regulation push is a trojan horse for regulatory capture and subsequent domination of the industry by large, well-connected players who are hostile to privacy and individual freedom.
So when you see US people on a US site complaining about a law that affects US industry, especially scrappy startups, consider if maybe there’s more to it.
> Over the coming weeks, we will add an invisible watermark to eligible ChatGPT and Codex text output in the European Union.
Otherwise, I don't see any logic explanation that some of there benchmarks results would be higher when watermarked. Except if benchmark results are so unstable that they are a useless metric.