Bender: AI's 'Existential' Risk Is 'Fake' [video](youtube.com) |
Bender: AI's 'Existential' Risk Is 'Fake' [video](youtube.com) |
What is troubling to me is I can’t think of a single prominent AI skeptic who has changed their mind. Are there any?
She lists many valid AI risks, discounts the doomsday PR and instead talks about the accountability gap that current AI frontier companies profit from.
I'm sure her Twitter timeline is awful, as you noted. But do you have thoughts on the arguments she presents in the linked video?
edit: I think she is absolutely right about the percentage risk numbers. Apparently, those numbers are not particularly meaningful beyond their functional use of communicating a sense of urgency. I think p(doom) is very similar to the Cold War doomsday clock. An instrument of irresponsible, fearbased PR.