Yet another way to invoke functions without parentheses(blog.ikaes.de) |
Yet another way to invoke functions without parentheses(blog.ikaes.de) |
> We stopped when we got a clean compile on the following syntax:
for(;P("\n"),R--;P("|"))for(e=C;e--;P("_"+(*u++/8)%2))P("| "+(*u/4)%2);‘Larry, throw the cat at the keyboard!’
MEEEOW!
‘What did it type?’
‘&}Ak'>v=4%Qe}9;’
‘OK, so let’s make this a syntax for hello world.’
I haven't seen it in many many years, but at the time it struck my giggle button every time.
Bareword found where operator expected (Missing operator before "Ak"?) at -e line 1, near "&}Ak" Bad name after Ak' at -e line 1.
(((x)f)g)h
f(g(h(x)))
since the order in which things happen is "h first, then g, then f"
That will also serves as a litmus test to check how many of my coworkers are reading the code they push.
“Back in my days…”
“No true Scotsman…”
“I remember when…”
“Kids these days…”
Gotta love this self-aggrandising humble-brag nonsensical stuff.
aka "Chrome implemented this and wanted everyone else to do so as well"
Object.prototype.message='alert\x281337\x29';Array.prototype.toString=Error.prototype.toString;Error.prepareStackTrace = Function;const x = new Error;x.valueOf=x.stack;+x;
(function () {/*
my awesome shader code
*/}).toString().match(/[^]*\/\*([^]*)\*\/\}$/)[1]
(x=>/*this is a comment*/1) + 1
"x=>/*this is a comment*/11"