From Google News to the Chicago Tribune: Observations after a month(chicagotribune.com) |
From Google News to the Chicago Tribune: Observations after a month(chicagotribune.com) |
I certainly enjoyed being around reporters, and the programming team was one of the most fun I've ever been on. The computer science wasn't terribly deep (we joked that we mostly take, store, sort, display strings), but it was fun to be able to point people at interesting things you built[1], complex or not. And I do miss working with mostly industry-standard tech.
We got re-org'ed out of the newsroom a year before I left, though. Unless you're a huge newspaper with a commitment to the flavor of reporting that requires programming, a dedicated programming team doesn't make sense: better to consolidate at some central, non-newsroom location where you can build common applications for multiple newspapers and radio/tv stations.
On the other hand, I now work at YouTube, which is an exceptionally exciting, fun, dynamic (both culturally and pythonically) place to be. The scale makes things very interesting, and we affect people the world over. Oh, and San Francisco.
I should probably write a more carefully written blog post...
I agree that the industry hasn't shaken totally free of the fucked up financial straights they got themselves into, but as it stands, there are way more developer jobs working on actual journalism projects (not building or maintaining CMSes) than there are developers to fill them (just see http://www.newsnerdjobs.com/ for some examples).
But ultimately you're absolutely right, there are tradeoffs, and working for an insolvent company is one of the ones you have to watch out for, although that's true out in startup land as well. Depends what you're looking for i suppose!
I'd be curious to hear more about what you worked on over at AJC (some of my coworkers were investigative reporters there a few years ago).
Although I don't know him, I am familiar with the News Apps team at the Chicago Tribune. Call it Data Journalism, news room development or whatever, but in almost all cases, people who work on news apps teams are developers, not (just) journalists.
So, if you're willing to accept TechCrunch op-eds from startup founders about the topics of their startups (and Hacker News certainly seems to), I am bewildered as to why you would have a problem with a developer comparing his current and former employment situations, and explaining why he prefers his current employer.
None of that harms his points, which I think are quite sound, and the actual article does not imply Abe was a full-time engineer at Google, but the HN title does seem to connote it.
I think Google used to have a corporate culture which encouraged this and from what this writer says (so it's just an anecdote, not data) they might be losing that culture. Doesn't mean Google will fail but having that kind of culture is an ongoing job and it's non-trivial. Seems like they might be letting bureaucracy creep into the organization.
I say this as a former newsroom developer...One of the major impediments is the lack of digital literacy by the non-developer journalists. That is, before you can build a cool app based on their reporting and notes, you are going to spend a lot of time writing software that converts their reporting/notes into usable, parsable data...a problem that could be avoided if more reporters knew basic concepts of delimitation and data types...one workaround I've suggested is to take notes in a spreadsheet, instead of creating a folder of variably-named text files, i.e. "INTERVIEW WITH J.SMITH 9/5/12-Tuesday.doc"
It's up again at the end of next month: http://ire.org/conferences/nicar-2013/
They're also one of the friendliest communities I've ever met. I've been to many tech and academic conferences, but nothing's ever been as open and inviting as a journalism conference.
You can get a master's of journalism from one of the nation's best journalism schools at a greatly reduced price.
To each his own, but why is this news? I like coding without wearing any socks but I don't see NYT writing about it
But the constraints of keeping a billion people's needs in the back of your mind are real, and they impose limitations on what you consider worthwhile. It just wouldn't make sense for Google to study Chicago Public School utilization data, for instance - it's waaaaay too small a focus - but I find it deeply fun and meaningful, and not having to make something bulletproof for 1/6 the planet to potentially use just means it gets out the door quicker.
But your point about working on fun projects that are too small to matter to the world at large is very well taken.