U.K. Government Thought Destroying Guardian Hard Drives Would Stop Stories(washingtonpost.com) |
U.K. Government Thought Destroying Guardian Hard Drives Would Stop Stories(washingtonpost.com) |
1) They didn't want anyone else to get access to the material that the Guardian had but would not end up publishing;
2) The rules said that that's what they had to do, so they did it;
3) That's all they could do on "their patch", so CYA;
4) A little intimidation would never go amiss, surely...
Backups are hard - if there was even a slight chance that they destroyed the only copy of something, why not go ahead with it? They're not that stupid.
I sense the Guardian piece doesn't tell the whole story.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/19/david-m...
"As Gestapo chief of operations and later (after 1939) its chief, Müller played a leading role in the detection and suppression of all forms of resistance to the Nazi regime.[12] Under his leadership, the Gestapo succeeded in infiltrating and to a large extent destroying the underground networks of the Communist Party and the Social Democratic Party by the end of 1935."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_M%C3%BCller_%28Gestapo...
1984 was neither prophetic nor cautionary; it was merely descriptive.
This would more accurately portray the threat that they pose -- they're people in charge of running the world, and their backwards notions of how the world should operate will lead us down a very dark hole of no return. They need to be stopped quickly.
Largest UK companies (that seemed recognizable): HSBC, Shell, BP, Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays, GlaxoSmithKline, Unilever, Vodafone, Anglo American (thought the name was funny for a huge British company), Prudential, Coldplay
Edit: Added services
Edit 2: Added list of largest UK companies
Edit 3: Added Coldplay
Here is a story about exports to repressive regimes, this bit alone is troubling, and a believe it's just a fraction of exports. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/blood-money-uk...
which is laughable in the very redditesque way you just brought up.
> "sending people to concentration camps/gulags, murdering families."
Those are things you said, not him. You uncharitably read an absurd statement of equivalence where he merely made a comparison.
The refusal to see parallels or accept comparisons to dark periods in recent history unless they are 100% equivalent is a disease that threatens our ability to learn lessons from the past. If we only accept comparisons to the Gestapo when they begin gassing people en-masse, then it is too late.
i am an austrian of polish decent. for me bringing up the fucking nazis in this context is completely laughable.
the securitate? maybe. the stasi? same. but only internet nerd rage immediately brings up nazis, fascism, etc. the whole discussion here at HN is an exercise in hyperbolic bullshit.
It's like saying "Let's not go to this bar anymore, because mafia comes in every now and then and confiscates profit from the owner". Owner is not responsible and the mafia is going to invade every bar you switch to, because it follows the money.
And of course, the usual question - but what about the poor who can't afford it? Well, if a democratic system means that the majority of people agree that helping the poor is a good idea, I see nothing impossible in those very same people giving money to charities voluntarily, without any system forcing them to. Except that in a voluntary system the charities are also much more accountable than a government, because as soon as this charity fails to deliver what was promised, people stop donating.