I study software processes for a living. Most of the organizations I've looked at are large enough and have mature enough processes that some of your list doesn't apply.

In a recent project, we sent a request to an industry luminary (one of the signers of the Agile Manifesto), on what metric(s) would be ideal for improving the quality output of agile teams. He responded back that the only metric he thought worth considering was the number of interruptions developers encountered daily.

The company we were studying at the time made two distinct changes: 1) re-working their automated build failure notification email (better recipient targeting, clearer error highlighting) resulting in faster fix commits. 2) An organizational push to trim their unit test suite (by about half) which decreased time needed for hardening and freed resources for new development.