It's way too long to do a rebuttal here, though.

Some problems:

- Bad terminology ("C has no object", when in fact the term really is very useful in C even though it probably doesn't mean what you expect if you come from C++ or Python)

- "Booleans don't exist", I don't understand how the author can both acknowledge C99 and say this. Booleans do exist! Their name is not so user-friendly, unless you include stdbool.h, then you get bool, true and false.

- Pure random errors, like the first structure example code ("struct point foo={x: 5, y: 4};", what are those colons and numbers doing there?!)

And so on.

Of course you can represent utf8 in null terminated strings but you have to escape escape the null character, or if used as a terminator implicitly assume it's there. The basic jist of that was that I wanted to say, dont use byte encodings internally if you got large registers available and keep attention to null termination and it's pitfalls.

But justification beside I'm going to give it more time and reference check against the standard, refrase my intentions so that they are clear and probably shine more light on the positive aspects of the language and put it intro relation with other languages.

Hacker News isn't a place for pre alpha done in very little time drafts.