Headline is incorrect: She did not email models of her vagina, she sent "data that could be used to create 3D models of her vagina".

Small point? Nope. Quoting again, "one debate is about whether the scanned 3D data can be categorised as obscene unless the recipients have printed it out".

The actual BBC headline is "Japan 'vagina artist' arrest sparks debate".

This was posted yesterday too, with an article from TechCrunch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8036462 The photo on the BBC article is more interesting but TechCrunch had a good video from the artist.