A Guide to Debug.exe

A Guide to Debug.exe(thestarman.pcministry.com)

29 points by infinity 11 years ago | 10 comments

fooqux 11 years ago |

Reminds me about how I nearly got kicked out of highschool for changing the background color of sol.exe.

Back in my HS days, the "computer class" teacher (in quotes because it wasn't a computer class at all, rather a typing class) used to walk around and say "I don't want to see any green screens". Green, of course, being the background color of the built-in solitaire card game back in Windows 3.11 days.

I took a screenshot as a bmp, and found the hex value for the background color. Then I fired up debug, having nearly no idea what I was doing, searched for that hex value, found it, and then changed it to a nice mauve color. Thought it would be funny, maybe even praise-worthy.

Instead, the teacher lost his shit. These computers were "locked down" by basically just putting all the admin-type shortcuts into a password protected program group. But File->Run was still there, and it had no problem firing up COMMAND.COM. I didn't think it would be a big deal, but of course it was completely blown out of proportion by the teacher, who didn't exactly like my attitude.

I still dislike that man.

dsp1234 11 years ago | |

I had almost the exact opposite experience. I was in a typing class, but I'd been typing for several years (programming c/c++ on an old 286). I breezed through the typing portion, then started messing around with the computer itself. The teacher caught me, and said "You know what? I know how to handle this.". He handed me a copy of something called "Visual Basic version 4". The rest is history.

makmanalp 11 years ago | |

It does sound like you were being a bit of a smartass :-)

But at that point, the teacher could have dealt with that two ways: way one would be doing exactly what he did, and way two would be to ask you how you did it, then find you a cool project to channel that curiosity into.

It's a sad thing when a teacher would rather beat someone into submission instead of give them a chance to grow.

Someone1234 11 years ago | | |

It is worth keeping in mind, that in particular in the 1990s, many "computer" and "IT" teachers were just other types of teachers who happened to have been roped into it.

So to say they knew nothing about computing would be an understatement. Many of them literally only knew what was in the course material and nothing else. Yet they were the school's "expert."

If a kid broke a computer, everyone was screwed. The teacher couldn't fix it. And they would have to get in an outside company, like RM, or HP to fix it. That could take weeks.

This should go some way of explaining the mentality of these teachers. They were always living on borrowed time and knew they didn't know anything. A single bad incident would reveal all. That's why you get so many stories like this, it is also why it was unlikely that a teacher would be able to create a fun project for such a student (because they didn't know anything!).

Things have changed a lot since then. Not only are teachers technically better, but security is better, and technical support infrastructure is better defined (i.e. schools actually have an "IT guy" even if they're working for a third party).

chinpokomon 11 years ago | | |

I was forced to take a CS High School course by my school district for being computer illiterate, despite having already taken two college programming courses in BASIC and Pascal, and working at a local Egghead Software. I took CS 2 AP and self-taught myself C in about a month. After figuring out how to get around the Novell network restrictions and running unsupervised Doom death matches and Street Fighter 2 tournaments with my classmates, I was reassigned as a student aid to run around the campus to fix teacher's computers.

Probably a better use of my time and channel of my curiosity.

nbaksalyar 11 years ago |

It's interesting that you can write relatively complete programs with Debug.exe assembler.

This link made me remember my weird experiment from 2009 to write a NES Battle City [1] clone with debug.exe assembler [2]. Of course it wasn't completed, but nevertheless, it even switches to a graphic mode and draws a single sprite on the screen and takes input from the keyboard. :)

The demo [3] still should be working in DosBox.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_City_(video_game)

[2] https://code.google.com/p/asmbattlecity/source/browse/

[3] https://code.google.com/p/asmbattlecity/downloads/detail?nam...

chris_overseas 11 years ago |

This article really brought back some great memories for me. I learned about computers as a kid back in the early 80s on an MS-DOS clone PC. The only manuals I had was one listing the various MS-DOS commands (sadly, excluding anything about debug.exe though) and one that was a command reference for gwbasic.exe [1].

I spent many hours trying to write games in gw-basic but quickly realised that the performance was atrocious, to say the least. Eventually I stumbled across a magazine that had a two-page article about debug.exe and it was my gateway to a whole new hidden world. I went on to learn 8086 assembly with debug.exe by trial and error and from stepping through other programs. Eventually I figured out I could write little 8086 assembly routines in debug.exe myself, take the sequence of bytes that made up that routine, declare them as a DATA statement in a BASIC program and then just make call that DATA line to run the machine code directly [2]. It wasn't until many months later I finally managed to get my hands on some compilers and assemblers (Borland Turbo Pascal and Turbo Assembler being my favourites back then) which of course made my life a whole lot easier! I continued to use debug.exe for many years though, primarily for reverse engineering.

I've just managed to dig up an obfuscated "Hello World" batch file I wrote many years ago that makes use of debug.exe, see [3] below (If you actually want to run it you'll probably need an MS-DOS emulator [4][5] or an older version of Windows that still has debug.exe).

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GW-BASIC

[2] http://www.antonis.de/qbebooks/gwbasman/appendix%20d.html

[3] http://www.redyeti.net/extra/hello.bat

[4] https://jamesfriend.com.au/pce-js/ibmpc-games/

[5] http://www.dosbox.com/

whoopdedo 11 years ago |

One of the more useful things that was done with debug.exe was a binary-to-ascii converter for sending files in email or usenet and the recipient didn't need any extra tools. I think the program was called "xxdebug" after xxencode which was a descendent of uudecode. But Google doesn't help, so either my memory is wrong or the internet has forgotten.

I'm positive I have it on an archived disk somewhere. If I were inclined to resurrect it.

Zardoz84 11 years ago |

Another relic of old times is the font installer embed on Windows. Since Windows 3.1 to Windows XP has the exact same program! You can check that it's keeps using the old GUI to navigate across the filsesystem, not showing the "Destop" false root.

On Windows Vista and forward was replaced by something more modern.

chrisbennet 11 years ago |

The smallest program I ever wrote, I wrote using debug.exe. It was 7 bytes long. I think it reset the graphics card. This was around 1991.