Is gogs dead?(github.com) |
Is gogs dead?(github.com) |
Seems kind of fickle and impatient. Gogs is a great project, and that thread doesn't seem to imply that it's dead only on a brief hiatus. If development resumes will the new fork merge back in, or will it try to compete?
Not sure why it showed up here, though.
The forked readme.md replaces the contact email in: "If you think there are vulnerabilities in the project, please talk privately to u@gogs.io. Thanks!"
That doesn't seem like a temporary fork maneuver.
- No really consensus / official decision on the issue
- "Git with a cup of tea,"
When it's done so fast, it feels like a coup.
I understand the right to fork a project, but for a maintainer to be AFK from issues for a few weeks to necessitate a fork is harsh.
Have you read the licence ?
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions
If the author did not want any fork, they would have chosen another one. period.
People should learn about open source before starting bitching and whining about "hijacking". Hijacking, really ? That's not even possible with opensource: forking, sharing, modifying, that's _exactly_ the open source spirit and it's actually backed by the license.
The maintainer didn't just make a simple fork. He renamed it, bought a domain, all behind the owners back while he's on vacation.
From an etiquette standpoint, I wouldn't want to work with a maintainer who just hijacks projects. Based on the behavior I've seen, I'm saddened to see this.
This project's contributors are Chinese: https://github.com/gogits/gogs/graphs/contributors. The gross majority of the commits come from a few people - the project has been around for years. And over a period of a few weeks, this happened, by an outsider.
They are probably gfw'd and have difficulty finding a VPN.
Unknwon does some other stuff now and seems to not care about gogs anymore and as far as i know he's not willing to accept other contributors or people in the organization that gauns write access. So now there is the fork Gitea which gets lots of attention and already multiple bugfixes. The for months outstanding feature of pull requests will be done pretty soon as well. Ah, and I forgot to mention that the project title still shows that it's a gogs fork beside of some files that are still named gogs.
Sigh. I don't know, maybe he's on holiday and you're not entitled to demand a response from him?
http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/04/ddos-attacks-that-cr...
Readme.md's Acknowledgments and Contributors sections appear to still be in place, with the credit-improving (IMO) change of replacing the link text "core team" to "gogs team".
What else would you expect? The github forked-from notice if you use the github button instead of git to fork, I guess? Anything else?
I'm trying to figure out if your devoid of the nuance of open source politics, or if you're a huge risk taker.