A DDoS in Asia Pacific(telegram.org) |
A DDoS in Asia Pacific(telegram.org) |
Some people think it's China who attack Telegram, to avoid the lawyers to warning each other for the arrestment.
1) https://www.facebook.com/chrlcg/photos/a.1571958406350448.10...
2) http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-07/11/c_128010249.ht...
We know from this year's GitHub attack that (a) China is willing to DDoS foreign internet services, and (b) China is able to enlist foreign traffic to carry out the actual attack.
So it wouldn't be surprising if China DDoSed Telegram and made it look like the attack came from South Korea.
For whatever reason, somebody in South Korea is seriously pissed off with Telegram.
In recent days, there's been another exodus of Koreans from domestic IM services due to the revelation that the Korean army has been a customer of Hacking Team, the Italian spyware vendor who got hacked last week.
The two incidents might be related.
The garbage traffic came from about a hundred thousand
infected servers, most noticeably, in LeaseWeb B.V.,
Hetzner Online AG, PlusServer AG, NFOrce Entertainment
BV, Amazon and Comcast networks. That said, the attack
was distributed evenly across thousands of hosts and none
contributed more than 5% of the total volume.
I used to host a lot with Hetzner, and while quite expensive, they mostly responded to these kinds of things very quickly and with a certain level of technical competence (which definitely cannot be said of every hoster). Also, I'm quite surprised to not see OVH in there, as their network has a kind of "reputation" for these things... Fighting back would‘ve been a little easier, if the abuse
departments in most of the mentioned companies didn’t
process requests 9-5, Mon-Fri only. (Hours more befitting
a scuba-diving shop in Vatican.)
Business as usual I would say...although I don't scuba-dive...Edit: formatting
The most unusual aspect of this attack was that it was an easily blocked, rudimentary attack using spoofed, big SYNs. Volumetric attacks have subsided and fallen out of favor over the past year. Everything now is layer 7 floods at high rates or low-and-slow to avoid detection. Either way it's mostly layer 7 these days. People I've talked with at Cloudflare and Prolexic have seen the same thing.
Also, we saw these big SYN floods about 3 years ago (before Radware coined the term). They are easy to block, the attackers went away, and we haven't really seen any since. I think this is a 3+ year old botnet run by an attacker who hasn't kept up with the times.
tl;dr this botnet is a bit long in the tooth
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg08204....
We started blocking these large requests over 3 years ago when we started seeing them. Interestingly enough, that was a full 6-9 months before Radware wrote an article and coined the term Tsunami SYN. We just called it "big SYN". The attack is trivially easy to stop, and anyone running a client that tries a TCP Fast Open should expect failure frequently.
Anyway, we decided to move to OVH, and haven't had any problem since. We did get an email about an attack being mitigated a few months ago (which didn't cause any outage at all), and since then the trolls have realised that we can't be DDoSed any more :)
It's easier for assholes in some countries to launch DDoS attacks than it is for assholes in other countries.
With the one of the world's largest userbases of outdated IE with tons of ActiveX plugins, South Korea sure is a nice place to run a botnet.
On the other hand, most of the ISPs mentioned in the article are not Korean, so maybe it's a bit more complicated.
If by "nationalists" you mean the notorious online community known as ilbe, that's definitely possible. They're a weird amalgam of political ideology and lulz, basically the neocon counterpart to /b/.
But it could just as well have been a shady competitor who got pissed off with Telegram for whatever reason. The social networking market in Korea is cutthroat. Almost everyone treats it as a zero-sum game where you have to destroy all the others in order to succeed. Maybe this competitor was planning to launch what it considered a killer feature and Telegram launched it first. Stickers?
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1467534&highl...
That said, I'm not a personal search engine. Here's a link to search results:
OVH themselves say they protect 24/7 against DDoS attacks, regardless of duration or size.