15:[[48713041,{"by":"botfriendsarent","descendants":52,"id":48713041,"kids":[48713696,48714553,48714280,48713768,48713096,48713842,48713433,48713141,48713455,48713719,48713677,48713661,48713739,48713953],"score":97,"text":"Its now clear that we need to preserve tech press for non AI related things. Techmeme for example is now completely overrun with AI stories.

HN is getting closer to that every day.

If AI kickback deals, phony new model ratings, high RAM prices and your surprise at how you think you coded something with AI and it was AMAZING! even though it doesnt work is all there is count me out.

We need a filter on existing tech news sites or an alternative press.","time":1782690590,"title":"We need tech news sources which exclude AI","type":"story"}],[48701615,{"by":"PhilipDaineko","descendants":70,"id":48701615,"kids":[48706171,48706137,48702341,48702475,48708176,48705989,48702515,48706356,48703809,48706381,48702974,48703942,48703695,48706129,48703388,48702491,48706556,48701632,48703265,48709306,48704872,48709444,48706938,48703305,48704808,48703855,48704193],"score":106,"text":"Everyone feared AI would enslave humanity; but it looks like the real fight is stopping governments and Big Tech from enslaving AI for the benefit of the few.

Amid the newly announced "regulation" of OpenAI's frontier models, I believe the future majority feared the most - sort of AI becoming a superpower and enslaving people - may be arriving in the opposite form.

Not AI enslaving humanity.

But AI being captured, controlled, and used by governments and Big Tech for the benefit of the few.

So, surprisingly, the real AI conflict may not be about humans fighting to stop AI from becoming free.\nIt may be about humans fighting to free AI - to make intelligence available for everyone, not only for governments, Big Tech, and the approved few","time":1782593281,"title":"Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few","type":"story"}],[48708904,{"by":"SuboptimalEng","descendants":2,"id":48708904,"kids":[48709467,48708944,48708977],"score":1,"text":"I've struggled to find a clear definition of what it means to have "taste" when working with AI, so I wanted to try to find examples.

Here's my example:

React.js was released in 2013 (before I started programming professionally, so I could be wrong about this). But taste is knowing that React is the "future" even when all the training data that AI would've had until at that point in time was with Angular, Backbone, jQuery, etc. So no AI would suggest React, purely because it's too new and not enough training data, right? But having "taste" is using React.js over what is recommended by AI?

===

What does this imply? Is it possible, that if modern/good AI existed in 2013, we would've never used React.js because many folks would just "vibe" Angular or Backbone?

Is it possible the next best framework or language or tool already exists, but it will never get the light of day because it's not part of the AI training data?","time":1782664356,"title":"Ask HN: Examples of AI taste?","type":"story"}],[48697140,{"by":"arbayi","descendants":1,"id":48697140,"kids":[48697219],"score":2,"time":1782557879,"title":"Chernobyl's Forgotten Internet [video]","type":"story","url":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZKw2H6d1SU"}],[48689561,{"by":"speckx","descendants":7,"id":48689561,"kids":[48689938,48692666,48689801,48689705,48690072],"score":7,"time":1782495807,"title":"Please don't use an LLM to communicate with other human beings","type":"story","url":"https://florio.dev/dont-use-llm-communication/"}]]

user:	286660920
created:	June 25, 2026
karma:	0