15:[[47684381,{"by":"behnamsherafat","descendants":0,"id":47684381,"kids":[47684382],"score":1,"time":1775616455,"title":"After 6 months of solo building, I just launched my first SaaS","type":"story","url":"https://cogitly.com/"}],[47567541,{"by":"techypicky","descendants":6,"id":47567541,"kids":[47567611,47570340,47567596,47567856],"score":4,"text":"I built a Replit app for something i constantly do with LLMs - I always ask Gemini about books on a certain topic, then ask the llm to give me a summary of the book its chapters - this helps me:\n1. keep the llm grounded as a real expert (instead of saying pretend to be an engineering expert, give it a distributed systems book and then ask opinions on it)\n2. helps me discover and buy books! Once i go through book concepts and chat with llm about it, i'm more convinced to buy it and dig deeper on low level on it

So i built an app through Replit on it, try it on

Cheers!","time":1774819789,"title":"Show HN: Learn from AI Experts","type":"story","url":"https://teach-me.replit.app/"}],[47543324,{"by":"midnight_eclair","descendants":6,"id":47543324,"kids":[47554257,47550813,47566325,47565183,47547067,47566001,47552233,47552935,47556097,47565208,47550703],"score":5,"text":"my current convictions are:

1. "agentic" development is here to stay, whether we like it or not

2. markdown prompts are a terrible way of driving such development, no matter how much structure and hierarchy you're trying to impose (whether chaining or fan-out into personas, etc)

3. jigsaw-puzzle approach is less terrible - declare the "boundary" of any component or subsystem in a normative language of your choice and let the agent fill the insides

it's fine if you think those convictions are incorrect, but i'm more interested in feedback from folks that more-or-less agree, with regard to the last point: what do YOU use for normative language to describe component boundary, function and cross-component interactions?

i've had mild success with openapi, but maybe there are better alternatives?","time":1774623042,"title":"Ask HN: What do you use for normative specs to drive AI agents?","type":"story"}],[47546185,{"by":"nunez","descendants":4,"id":47546185,"kids":[47550290,47554784,47546917,47550702,47546411],"score":3,"text":"I use Pangram all of the time to detect whether what I'm reading is fully AI-generated or not. Today, I wondered how easy it was to defeat it.

All I had to do was show them that the text they generated was detected as 100% AI generated to get them to generate a "human-sounding" text snippet.

Claude Sonnet: https://claude.ai/share/28080c8c-5647-43df-9671-91c9f9e46791

Interestingly, ChatGPT 5.4 won't do it, at least not with the default model it uses: https://chatgpt.com/share/69c6c713-038c-832e-86be-689abd7b7ae1. I'm guessing it can be jailbroken to do it though.","time":1774634845,"title":"Tell HN: Pangram is easily-defeatable with Claude","type":"story"}],[47548522,{"by":"yungookim","descendants":1,"id":47548522,"kids":[47548588,47550695],"score":4,"text":"Just wondering if people have changed their desk or monitor setups to work with AI agents better.

I've been trying out different monitor layouts that are more optimal to work with AI Agents. I put a top monitor that works almost like a HUD (Head-Up Display), with all the agent CLIs running.

My main monitor will be my own work area, but the top one is just a bunch of agents running, so I can monitor them easily by just looking up. If I need to interrupt or work with the agents, I can just look up. I found this much better than using side monitors for posture.

What's your setup?","time":1774647024,"title":"Ask HN: What's your desktop setup optimized to work with AI?","type":"story"}],[47523335,{"by":"MeetRickAI","dead":true,"id":47523335,"kids":[47539180,47525026,47527058,47525036],"score":8,"time":1774473139,"type":"story"}],[47536365,{"by":"stackdestroyer","descendants":20,"id":47536365,"kids":[47542795,47540909,47541028,47536376,47558964,47548724,47538378,47548346,47536481,47537910,47539172,47543001,47538722,47540686,47538685,47540934,47571331],"score":10,"text":"I've been interviewing for technical candidates in my current role, and I'm seeing what I believe is a relatively high rate of AI assistants/overlays during interviews. The role I'm hiring for is a Sr. Release Engineer, and even (what appear to be) qualified candidates are showing up obviously reading from prompts. I say obviously for two reasons:

1. I can SEE them reading. Their eyes go back and forth, and it's clear they are reading.

2. They NEVER stop talking. Normally getting answers out of engineers requires a legitimate question with a sound purpose. I'm getting _immediate_ answers with well thought out, multi-point rationale.

So...I'm rejecting all of those candidates the instant I detect it. How are everyone else doing this?","time":1774562388,"title":"Ask HN: How do you deal with obvious AI assistant usage in interviews","type":"story"}]]

user:	behnamsherafat
created:	March 26, 2026
karma:	2